Assessing interactions between cognition, emotion, and motivation in creativity: The construction and validation of EDICOS

Soroa, Goretti; Balluerka, Nekane; Hommel, Bernhard; Aritzeta, Aitor

doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.002

Cited by 25 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, these instruments are often used separately, and each instrument has its specific limitations (Horn & Salvendy, 2006;Kaufman et al, 2007;Lemons, 2011). The isolation of the four aspects of creativity may give the impression that these aspects are independent (Batey, 2012;Soroa, Balluerka, Hommel, & Aritzeta, 2015); however, the four aspects are mutually related (Batey, 2012). Given the multidimensional nature of creativity and the interrelationships among its different aspects, no single instrument can comprehensively capture this construct (Cropley, 2000;Fishkin & Johnson, 1998;Hennessey & Amabile, 2010;Lemons, 2011;Treffinger et al, 2002).…”

Section: Domain-generality/ Specificity Of Creativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodological Issues in Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review

Said-Metwaly

Noortgate

Kyndt

2017

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing body of creativity research has raised several challenging issues with regard to the measurement of this construct. This paper aims to provide a review of current challenging methodological issues related to measuring creativity. Five methodological issues are discussed: selecting measurement instruments, sampling, testing conditions, psychometric properties and domain-generality/specificity of creativity. This paper reveals that there remain a number of unresolved issues and serious questions surrounding the measurement of creativity. Research gaps and suggestions for future research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Domain-generality/ Specificity Of Creativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodological Issues in Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review

Said-Metwaly

Noortgate

Kyndt

2017

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Plucker & Beghetto (2004) The interplay between ability and process by which an individual or group produces an outcome or product that is both novel and useful within some social context. Baas, De Dreu & Nijstad (2011);Bledow, Rosing & Frese (2013); Soroa et al (2015) Dynamic perspective -the interaction between thinking styles, affective dispositions, and motivational preferences.…”

Section: Conceptualization Of Creativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Adaptors tend to operate within given paradigms and procedures while innovators tend to develop problem solutions that are qualitatively different from previous ones. Consequently, bipolar cognition dimensions have been recognized: rule-oriented cognitive strategies and set-breaking cognitive strategies (Soroa et al, 2015). When it comes to thinking styles as individuals' predominant patterns of using mental abilities to manage tasks (Zhang & Sternberg, 2009), nonlinear dynamical thinking style (called also a creative thinking style) is regarded as crucial since it is predisposed to novelty and individuals manage to adopt new perspectives (Groves & Vance, 2014).…”

Section: Edwards-schachter Et Al (2015)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding emotion, two dominant dimensions have been recognized as critically salient: positive affect (mood) facilitating cognitive flexibility and negative one calling for perseverance (De Dreu, Baas & Nijstad, 2008;Russell & Carroll, 1999;Soroa et al, 2015). Moreover, positive mood causes that cognitive or motivational processes are enhanced and their creative thinking and problem solving skills are facilitated (Shalley, Zhou & Oldham, 2004).…”

Section: Edwards-schachter Et Al (2015)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Multi-level Homologous Logic and Prospective Research Concept on the Effects of Creativity and Ambidextrous Leadership on Innovative Performance

Piórkowska

2017

jmr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the paper is to develop a conceptual research framework with regard to the relationships between creativity, ambidextrous leadership and innovative performance incorporating a multi-level homologous perspective. The aim has been achieved through critical extensive literature studies. The overarching key finding is that the effects of creativity and ambidextrous leadership on innovative performance may be examined within a multi-level homologous approach illustrating the associations among creativity, creative performance, and organizational performance at the individual, team, and organizational performance. The first section presents a general overview of the creativity phenomenon, namely creativity conceptualization as well as antecedents and effects at individual, team, and organizational level. The creativity with regard to ambidextrous leadership has been highlighted in the second section. Then, creativity, ambidextrous leadership and innovative performance in terms of a multi-level homologous research concept (specifically, a model, propositions, and measurement tools proposed) have been illustrated in the third section. Final remarks and research directions have been posed in the last section.

show abstract

“…While the traditional view of creativity emphasizes its cognitive component over its affective component, recent decades have seen a noticeable rise in the number of studies focused on analyzing the influence of emotional and personal factors (motivation, emotion, and personality traits) on the cognitive processes involved in creativity (Baas, De Dreu, & Nijstad, 2008, 2011). From a dynamic perspective, creativity is considered an interaction between cognitive styles, emotional dispositions, and motivational preferences (Bledow, Rosing, & Frese, 2013; Soroa, Balluerka, Hommel, & Aritzeta, 2015). Specifically, results from neuropsychology research indicate that emotions and cognition interact in processes such as identifying problems, generating ideas, evaluating alternatives, and decision making (Phelps, 2006; Scherer, 2000).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and Validation of the Basque Version of the Emotional Creativity Inventory in Higher Education

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Emotional creativity is defined as the ability to feel and express emotions in a new, effective and authentic way. There are currently no Basque-language self-report instruments to provide valid and reliable measures of this construct. Thus, this paper describes the process of adapting and validating the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) for the Basque-speaking population. The sample was comprised of 594 higher education students (388 women and 206 men) aged between 18 and 32 years old (Mage = 20.47; SD = 2.48). The Basque version of the ECI was administered along with the TMMS-23, NEO PI-R, and PANAS. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on the Basque ECI corroborated the original scale's three-factor structure (preparedness, novelty, and effectiveness/authenticity). Those dimensions showed acceptable indexes of internal consistency (α = .80, .83, and .83) and temporal stability (r = .70, .69, and .74). The study also provided some evidence of external validity (p < .05) based on the relationships found between emotional creativity and emotional intelligence, personality, affect, and sex. The Basque ECI can be regarded as a useful tool to evaluate perceived emotional creativity during the preparation and verification phases of the creative process.

show abstract

Assessing interactions between cognition, emotion, and motivation in creativity: The construction and validation of EDICOS

Cited by 25 publications

References 55 publications

Methodological Issues in Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review

Methodological Issues in Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review

The Multi-level Homologous Logic and Prospective Research Concept on the Effects of Creativity and Ambidextrous Leadership on Innovative Performance

Adaptation and Validation of the Basque Version of the Emotional Creativity Inventory in Higher Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About