2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing invertebrate herbivory in human‐modified tropical forest canopies

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter study, authors did not investigate potential mechanisms driving herbivory under disturbances, but worked under more similar conditions to our study, in Amazonia and with fire as one of the disturbances. However, we found a considerably higher herbivory (48%) caused by our experimental recurrent fires than these authors found in logged and logged‐and‐burned forests in Central Amazon, which combined suffered 33% more herbivory than undisturbed and secondary forests (Barreto et al, 2021). This difference may be partially caused by their high level of variation within logged and logged‐and‐burned forests, that are likely under different recovery stages (Barreto et al, 2021), while our experimental plots all experienced the same disturbance and recovery time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the latter study, authors did not investigate potential mechanisms driving herbivory under disturbances, but worked under more similar conditions to our study, in Amazonia and with fire as one of the disturbances. However, we found a considerably higher herbivory (48%) caused by our experimental recurrent fires than these authors found in logged and logged‐and‐burned forests in Central Amazon, which combined suffered 33% more herbivory than undisturbed and secondary forests (Barreto et al, 2021). This difference may be partially caused by their high level of variation within logged and logged‐and‐burned forests, that are likely under different recovery stages (Barreto et al, 2021), while our experimental plots all experienced the same disturbance and recovery time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…However, we found a considerably higher herbivory (48%) caused by our experimental recurrent fires than these authors found in logged and logged‐and‐burned forests in Central Amazon, which combined suffered 33% more herbivory than undisturbed and secondary forests (Barreto et al, 2021). This difference may be partially caused by their high level of variation within logged and logged‐and‐burned forests, that are likely under different recovery stages (Barreto et al, 2021), while our experimental plots all experienced the same disturbance and recovery time. Additionally, their average herbivory in the undisturbed forest (5.9%) was much higher than ours (2.2%), suggesting a higher overall herbivory in central than in the southern edges of Amazonia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations