2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-014-9547-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing judicial performance in Indonesia: the court for corruption crimes

Abstract: New specialized courts have emerged in many countries, both in response to international pressure for legal reform and reflecting states' own choice. Among these courts are specialized anti-corruption courts. The Indonesian Court for Corruption Crimes in Jakarta, originally established by statute in 2002, gained prominence and notoriety for its near-100 % conviction rate in over 250 cases. However, in 2010, exclusive jurisdiction over corruption cases was 'decentralized' to special corruption courts establishe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper analyzes the justification for the creation of these courts and assesses the extent to which conviction rates can serve as reliable measures of their effectiveness. 19 It is evident that each law enforcement agency in Indonesia undertakes many endeavors to transfer assets obtained through criminal activities. The effectiveness of attempts to transfer the assets obtained from criminal activities in each law enforcement institution is the only aspect that has to be examined.…”
Section: Of 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper analyzes the justification for the creation of these courts and assesses the extent to which conviction rates can serve as reliable measures of their effectiveness. 19 It is evident that each law enforcement agency in Indonesia undertakes many endeavors to transfer assets obtained through criminal activities. The effectiveness of attempts to transfer the assets obtained from criminal activities in each law enforcement institution is the only aspect that has to be examined.…”
Section: Of 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pada dasarnya proses pembuktian sudah dimulai pada tahap penyidikan, ketika penyidik mencari bukti berdasarkan alur transaksi yang kemudian diolah sehingga dianggap sudah terjadi peristiwa pidana. Pembuktian dapat didefinisikan sebagai suatu peristiwa pidana benar telah terjadi dan ada terdakwa yang bersalah melakukannya, sehingga terdakwa tersebut harus mempertanggungjawabkan (Butt & Schütte, 2014;Christianto, 2020).…”
Section: Buktiunclassified
“…In fact, the protection of civil society as whistleblowers in mitigating the practice of corruption has received guarantees of protection and security. Based on Article 5 of Law Number 13 Year 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, in the form of physical, psychological, information and data confidentiality protection to a new residence (Butt, 2014). The threats and backlash of corruptors with their network of thugs and mafias have really left the anti-corruption civil society in a vulnerable position.…”
Section: The Role Of Community In Corruption Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%