1983
DOI: 10.1080/08920758309361939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing land‐use regulations in coastal wetlands: The case of the long point area, lake Erie, Ontario

Abstract: The first comprehensive attempt at development control along the Canadian Great Lakes shoreline was the 1976 lakeshore regulation policy adopted by the Regional Municipality of Haldimand-Norfolk on the north Lake Erie shore. This innovative strategy was initiated at the municipal level as a component of the regional land-use planning process. Determination of efficiency and effectiveness of the policy implementation process is based on analysis of permit approval files. All development applications submitted b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both locations, the level of filling is minor and the total number of applications was low. The overall approval rate is about 81%, the same rate as found in earlier assessments of Section 28 (Mitchell and Shrubsole, 1992;Shrubsole et al, 1995), and consistent with similar regulatory programs (Sabatier and Mazmanian, 1983;Claiborne Jones and Lynch, 1978;Owen and Jacobs, 1992;Jesson et al, 1983). Table 2 provides information concerning the conditions, if any, attached to the approval of an application.…”
Section:   supporting
confidence: 68%
“…In both locations, the level of filling is minor and the total number of applications was low. The overall approval rate is about 81%, the same rate as found in earlier assessments of Section 28 (Mitchell and Shrubsole, 1992;Shrubsole et al, 1995), and consistent with similar regulatory programs (Sabatier and Mazmanian, 1983;Claiborne Jones and Lynch, 1978;Owen and Jacobs, 1992;Jesson et al, 1983). Table 2 provides information concerning the conditions, if any, attached to the approval of an application.…”
Section:   supporting
confidence: 68%