2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing lower extremity coordination and coordination variability in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the hip should help move the frontal plane in this coupling. Davis et al [ 44 ] argued that the proximal coordination pattern indicated more proximal joint (the hip) contribution to motion relative to the distal joint (the knee). In other words, if the coupling angle falls within the proximal phase range, the hip has a larger movement than the knee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the hip should help move the frontal plane in this coupling. Davis et al [ 44 ] argued that the proximal coordination pattern indicated more proximal joint (the hip) contribution to motion relative to the distal joint (the knee). In other words, if the coupling angle falls within the proximal phase range, the hip has a larger movement than the knee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the coupling of the hip to the knee, the hip acts as a stabilizer in response to increased knee movement or instability. Therefore, the coupling angles increase so that the hip has fewer movements, and an attempt to increase the stability is shown [ 44 ]. The results obtained in this study differed from those of Davis et al [ 44 ] and maybe the reason for this difference is the type of task being evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined as the variation in motor performance over multiple repetitions of a task (James et al, 2000), movement variability has been explored in clinical presentations including, acute injury and pain (Seay et al, 2011, Weir et al, 2019, overuse injury (Hamill et al, 2012), injury recurrence (Edwards et al, 2017, Davis et al, 2019, pathology (Kawakami et al, 2019) and aging (Hausdorff et al, 2001). Therefore, movement variability is of interest to the clinician.…”
Section: Movement Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, movement variability is of interest to the clinician. The degree of movement variability may be a marker of a robust movement system, a theme apparent within clinically focussed, coordination variability literature (Davis et al, 2019, Kawakami et al, 2019, Weir et al, 2019. Although these emerging papers are highlighting the importance of considering movement variability, currently there is little direct translation into the clinic in terms of assessment and rehabilitation.…”
Section: Movement Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies into stride-to-stride variability indeed found decreased variability in ACL-deficient individuals compared to the intact contralateral knee and to healthy control knees (Decker et al, 2011;Moraiti et al, 2007). However, some studies have found more variability in ACLR-participants compared to healthy controls (Davis et al, 2019;Leporace et al, 2013;Moraiti et al, 2009;Moraiti et al, 2010). Presumably, the individual feels secure to add extra motion after ACLR even though the proprioceptive channels are not yet restored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%