2019
DOI: 10.21144/wp19-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Macroeconomic Tail Risk

Abstract: What drives macroeconomic tail risk? To answer this question, we borrow a definition of macroeconomic risk from Adrian et al. (2019) by studying (left-tail) percentiles of the forecast distribution of GDP growth. We use local projections (Jordà, 2005) to assess how this measure of risk moves in response to economic shocks to the level of technology, monetary policy, and financial conditions. Furthermore, by studying various percentiles jointly, we study how the overall economic outlook-as characterized by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across data and methodologies, many papers have confirmed the stability of upside growth risk and the variability of its downside risk, often referred to as "vulnerable growth." These results have been validated with quantile regression(Adrian, Grinberg, Liang, and Malik, 2018), at higher frequencies(Ferrara, Mogliani, and Sahuc, 2019), conditionally on shocks(Loria, Matthes, and Zhang, 2018), with VAR with stochastic volatility affecting the conditional mean(Carriero, Clark, and Marcellino, 2018a;Caldara, Scotti, and Zhong, 2019), with Markov switching models(Doz, Ferrara, and Pionnier, 2019), in labor markets(Kiley, 2018), and in housing markets(Valckx, Deghi, Katagiri, Khadarina, and Shahid, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Across data and methodologies, many papers have confirmed the stability of upside growth risk and the variability of its downside risk, often referred to as "vulnerable growth." These results have been validated with quantile regression(Adrian, Grinberg, Liang, and Malik, 2018), at higher frequencies(Ferrara, Mogliani, and Sahuc, 2019), conditionally on shocks(Loria, Matthes, and Zhang, 2018), with VAR with stochastic volatility affecting the conditional mean(Carriero, Clark, and Marcellino, 2018a;Caldara, Scotti, and Zhong, 2019), with Markov switching models(Doz, Ferrara, and Pionnier, 2019), in labor markets(Kiley, 2018), and in housing markets(Valckx, Deghi, Katagiri, Khadarina, and Shahid, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%