2007
DOI: 10.1002/ca.20511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing macroscopic and microscopic indicators of osteoarthritis in the distal interphalangeal joints: A cadaveric study

Abstract: Osteoarthritis is manifested both by macroscopically visible lesions and by specific histological indicators. Although traditional views of the disease process invoke physical abrasion of joint surfaces, recent studies indicate that tissue-level changes may precede grossly visible lesions of articular cartilage. This study investigates the association between gross and histological indicators of osteoarthritis at the manual interphalangeal joints, and examines a sequence of events that may lead to the onset of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 The histology of Heberden's nodes remains unclear, and a variety of pathologies have been described, including the presence of bony outgrowths that are consistent with osteophytosis, cartilage hypertrophy, or even mucoid transformation of the periarticular fibroadipose tissue associated with proliferation of myxoid fibroblasts and cyst formation. 10,58,62 However, only a weak correlation of Heberden's nodes and DIP osteophytes has been shown recently. 58…”
Section: What Are the Soft Tissue Changes In Osteoarthritis Of The DImentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…58 The histology of Heberden's nodes remains unclear, and a variety of pathologies have been described, including the presence of bony outgrowths that are consistent with osteophytosis, cartilage hypertrophy, or even mucoid transformation of the periarticular fibroadipose tissue associated with proliferation of myxoid fibroblasts and cyst formation. 10,58,62 However, only a weak correlation of Heberden's nodes and DIP osteophytes has been shown recently. 58…”
Section: What Are the Soft Tissue Changes In Osteoarthritis Of The DImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…9,45,64,65 For the DIP joint, histological analysis has shown that cartilage fibrillation, tide mark irregularities, and chondrocyte clustering are early microscopic indicators of DIP joint OA and are clearly linked to, and largely precede, the macroscopic degradation of the articular surface. 10 A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study demonstrated articular cartilage destruction, albeit variable, to have an ulnar as well as volar predilection. 57 Subchondral bone sclerosis, seen as low signal change in the subchondral bone on all sequences, was evident on the distal side of the DIP joints in 56% with early OA and 93% with chronic OA.…”
Section: What Are Cartilage and Bone Changes At The Distal Interphalamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both studies utilized clinical and radiographic signs to determine the severity of OA. This may be of particular importance because recent evidence suggests that histological markers can precede both clinical and radiographic evidence of OA (Agha and Webb 2006;Bentley and Hill 2007). In addition, although each study used slightly different methods for evaluating joint laxity, neither used the elastic fiber concentration of the knee joint capsule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specifically, we test the hypothesis that the concentration of elastic fibers per unit area is related to OA grade, based on macroscopic and histological observations. Histological analysis is included since recent evidence suggests that histological markers can predate both clinical and radiographic evidence of OA (Agha and Webb 2006;Bentley and Hill 2007). Using histological markers, we anticipate that the relationship can be evaluated at the earliest possible signs of OA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the disease process may be quite advanced at the histological level before any macroscopic changes become visible (Agha and Webb 2006, Bentley and Hill 2007). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%