1981
DOI: 10.2527/jas1981.5351406x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Minimum Amounts and Form of Roughages in Ruminant Diets: Roughage Value Index System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
1
18

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
56
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Trials in agricultural science results indicated that legumes are less costly to diminish in particle size than grasses when tested mechanically (Paul and Mika 1981;unpublished data in Wilson and Kennedy 1996;Henry et al 1997;Wilman et al 1997) or in vivo by the mastication action of domestic ruminants (Moseley and Jones 1984;Waghorn et al 1989;Wilman et al 1997). This is also reflected in the longer time spent ruminating (per unit of forage intake) for grass as compared with legumes in domestic ruminants (Sudweeks et al 1981;Wilman et al 1997;data in Coleman et al 2003). If a closer similarity is assumed between leguminous forages fed to domestic ruminants on the one, and browse material ingested by free-ranging, browsing ruminants on the other hand (as opposed to grass forage), then these reports support the general concept of grazers needing a particularly strong masticatory apparatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Trials in agricultural science results indicated that legumes are less costly to diminish in particle size than grasses when tested mechanically (Paul and Mika 1981;unpublished data in Wilson and Kennedy 1996;Henry et al 1997;Wilman et al 1997) or in vivo by the mastication action of domestic ruminants (Moseley and Jones 1984;Waghorn et al 1989;Wilman et al 1997). This is also reflected in the longer time spent ruminating (per unit of forage intake) for grass as compared with legumes in domestic ruminants (Sudweeks et al 1981;Wilman et al 1997;data in Coleman et al 2003). If a closer similarity is assumed between leguminous forages fed to domestic ruminants on the one, and browse material ingested by free-ranging, browsing ruminants on the other hand (as opposed to grass forage), then these reports support the general concept of grazers needing a particularly strong masticatory apparatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…TSAI et al (1967) relataram que baixo nível de fibra na ração reduz o estresse pelo calor e aumenta a produção de leite de vacas mantidas sob altas temperaturas. Contudo, de acordo com SUDWEEKS (1981), o teor de fibra na ração é importante e necessário para manter balanço adequado da fermentação ruminal e prevenir queda no teor de gordura do leite e diminuição no pH ruminal. A menor ingestão de alimentos pelas cabras estressadas e não-estressadas traduziu-se em decréscimo do consumo de proteína bruta na ração, cuja estimativa foi de 0,219 e 0,224 kg/dia, respectivamente.…”
Section: Packed Cell Volume (%)unclassified
“…Forages were often substituted by grains such as wheat or maize in order to increase both feed and energy intake. The high inclusion of feedstuffs high in non-structural carbohydrates decreases the content of fibre fractions in the diet and results in the risk of disorders like rumen acidosis following reduced chewing activity and saliva secretion as well as depression of fibre digestion and milk fat percentage (Sudweeks et al, 1981). Ensilaged maize products play an important role in the feeding of high-yielding dairy cows in Europe because they are high in energy content and its starch is relatively slowly fermented in the rumen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%