2019
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1662495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing mobility for persons with lower limb amputation: the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with the inclusion of two novel conditions

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the internal consistency, convergent and known-groups construct validity of the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with two novel conditions in persons with lower limb amputation, and to examine differences in walking performance between the three conditions within a group of persons with transtibial amputation and transfemoral amputation/knee disarticulation. Materials and methods: 50 adults with unilateral amputation participated, 28 of whom had undergone a transtibial amputation and 22 a tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight studies compared PLLA and CN, 28,31,46,49,51,52,54,55 four were within PLLA, 24,25,30,53 and seven assessed microprocessor vs non‐microprocessor prostheses 43‐45,47,48,50,55 . One study on the use of microprocessor prostheses made comparisons to both CN and PLLA using a non‐microprocessor prosthesis 55 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight studies compared PLLA and CN, 28,31,46,49,51,52,54,55 four were within PLLA, 24,25,30,53 and seven assessed microprocessor vs non‐microprocessor prostheses 43‐45,47,48,50,55 . One study on the use of microprocessor prostheses made comparisons to both CN and PLLA using a non‐microprocessor prosthesis 55 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could explore, the use of attractors within the context of the FO8WT, but with focus placed upon how a patient moves, along with how they approach each aspect of the FO8WT (e.g., clockwise and anti-clockwise turns). This is particularly important as both curved, and straight walking are utilized in everyday walking (Schack et al, 2019), and require patients to use different muscles (Hess et al, 2010;Wong et al, 2013). This may interlink with research that considers patient confidence regarding their own motor capability, which is argued to interlink with patient motivation and continued recovery (Morris et al, 2017), and whether this may then impact how therapists target different patients motor (re)learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During everyday functional tasks, both curved and straight walking are utilized to navigate around obstacles in an environment (Schack et al, 2019). A widely-used walking intervention which assesses both straight and curved path walking is the "figure of eight walk test" (FO8WT) (Hess et al, 2010;Wong et al, 2013;Welch et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comfort, stability, muscle fatigue) can be difficult to quantify with certainty. As a result of these challenges, researchers tend to motivate and validate their new devices with a narrow set of metrics; criteria that have been used include muscle activation [17][18][19], joint work [20,21], limb power [22], self-selected walking speed [23,24], peak moments [25,26], range of motion [27,28], kinematic symmetry [29,30], metabolic cost [22,[31][32][33], and extensive patientreported surveys [34][35][36][37]. Furthermore, these factors may provide competing indications of "optimal" device behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%