2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing multi-criteria approaches with environmental, economic and social attributes, weights and procedures: A case study in the Pampas, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…November et al (1996) integrated TransCAD GIS and goal programming for analyzing alternative patterns of school districting. Ghosh (2008) Cisneros et al (2011) to analyze the conflicts and trade-off among environmental, economic, and social interests in the context of agricultural land use.…”
Section: Goal Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…November et al (1996) integrated TransCAD GIS and goal programming for analyzing alternative patterns of school districting. Ghosh (2008) Cisneros et al (2011) to analyze the conflicts and trade-off among environmental, economic, and social interests in the context of agricultural land use.…”
Section: Goal Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma, Sarker, and Romagnoli (2011) introduced a model for assessing the impact of feedstock and technology selection, process and utility integration, and effluent recycle for a multi product multi platform biorefining enterprise. Cisnerosa et al (2011) used three continuous multi-criteria approaches and a set of different weights to assess the conflicts and trade-off among environmental, economic and social interests in the context of agriculture (soybean production). Mele, Kostin, Guillen-Gosalbez, and Jimenez (2011) developed a multiobjective mixed-integer linear program that is used as a quantitative tool to support SC design decision-making and aims at optimizing the economic and environmental performance of a combined sugar and ethanol production chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERO constraint, vb 2 : The annual erosion cannot be over 232 542 Mg, corresponding to the erosion estimate for 90 % soybean soil cover without SC (over 34 246 ha of agricultural soils) for a 1.5 % slope condition; from the authors, methods resumed in Cisneros et al (2011 f. EMP number constraint, vb 6 : The employment could not be less than the actual value, estimated as 382 jobs. vb 6 ≥382.…”
Section: Technical Constraints (Tc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRU constraint, vb 1 : The peak runoff must be less than 477 000 l·s −1 ; the maximum value was simulated for the more intensive soil-use scenario, methods in Cisneros et al (2011). This is a value that reflects a basin condition of maximum degradation or hydrological destabilisation.…”
Section: Technical Constraints (Tc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation