Group supervision is an extensively used format across many training agencies, yet it has been largely disregarded in theory and research within the supervision literature. In fact, the Guidelines for Clinical Supervision in Health Service Psychology (American Psychological Association, 2015a) mentions group supervision only one time, despite the fact that supervision within a group context includes competencies and considerations that are both unique and essential to the effective and ethical practice of group supervision. Because supervision conducted with multiple supervisees is multilayered and-as a resultmore complex, group supervisors need to develop special skills that go beyond the supervision dyad. This article looks to the literature on supervision-both individual and group modalities-and on group psychotherapy to highlight the practices and processes that set group supervision apart. Building upon the seven supervision competencies outlined by the American Psychological Association (Supervisor Competence; Diversity; Supervisory Relationship; Professionalism; Assessment/Evaluation/Feedback; Professional Competence Problems; and Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Considerations), which currently concentrate exclusively on individual supervision, we extend each area to include distinct features of group supervision. We include recommendations for supervisor training and for the application of effective group supervision practices, as well as ideas on how best to approach the formal adoption of group supervision guidelines for psychotherapists. Our hope is that, either in a revision of the Guidelines for Clinical Supervision in Health Service Psychology or in a freestanding supplement to the Guidelines, guidance for group supervision will be more explicitly included.
Clinical Impact StatementQuestion: How is clinical group supervision unique from clinical supervision conducted within a dyad? Findings: Group supervision, widely practiced, has important differences with individual supervision that have implications for effective and ethical training and practice. Meaning: Supervisors should consider the multitude of important complexities and strengths that occur in group supervision that go beyond individual supervision such as group dynamics, the supervisor and member relationships, the purpose, feedback to and evaluations of group supervisees to name a few. Next Steps: Ongoing research is needed on effective practices of group supervision and an expansion of the supervision competencies, or a new set of guidelines crafted that center on group supervision.