Integrating Curricular and Co-Curricular Endeavors to Enhance Student Outcomes 2016
DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78635-064-020161017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Multiple Dimensions of Significant Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increased emphasis in the scholarship of teaching and learning, more educators dialogue about learning design and assessment (e.g., Northwestern Michigan College [NMC], 2020). Learning grounded in experience is thought to be more fully embodied by the learner in this process, creating the possibility for cognitive, but also emotional and affective, gains (Rivera & Heinrich, 2016). But in narrow or overly orthodox views of EL theory, educators miss the potential to deepen educational design, instruction, assessment, and learning (Engeström & Sannino, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increased emphasis in the scholarship of teaching and learning, more educators dialogue about learning design and assessment (e.g., Northwestern Michigan College [NMC], 2020). Learning grounded in experience is thought to be more fully embodied by the learner in this process, creating the possibility for cognitive, but also emotional and affective, gains (Rivera & Heinrich, 2016). But in narrow or overly orthodox views of EL theory, educators miss the potential to deepen educational design, instruction, assessment, and learning (Engeström & Sannino, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%