Assessing national and subnational inequalities in medical care utilization and financial risk protection in Rwanda

Abstract

Background Ensuring equitable access to medical care with financial risk protection has been at the center of achieving universal health coverage. In this paper, we assess the levels and trends of inequalities in medical care utilization and household catastrophic health spending (HCHS) at the national and sub-national levels in Rwanda. Methods Using the Rwanda Integrated Living Conditions Surveys of 2005, 2010, 2014, and 2016, we applied multivariable logit models to generate the levels and trends of adjusted inequalities in medical care utilization and HCHS across the four survey years by four socio-demographic dimensions: poverty, gender, education, and residence. We measured the national- and district-level inequalities in both absolute and relative terms. Results At the national level, after controlling for other factors, we found significant inequalities in medical care utilization by poverty and education and -in HCHS by poverty in all four years. From 2005 to 2016, inequalities in medical care utilization by the four dimensions did not change significantly, while the inequality in HCHS by poverty was reduced significantly. At the district level, inequalities in both medical care utilization and HCHS were larger than zero in all four years and decreased over time. Conclusions Poverty and poor education were significant contributors to inequalities in medical care utilization and HCHS in Rwanda. Policies or interventions targeting poor households or households headed by persons receiving no education are needed in order to effectively reduce inequalities in medical care utilization and HCHS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12939-019-0953-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

High prevalence of epilepsy in Northern Rwanda: Exploring gender differences

“…We cannot exclude however that specific roles in the household, for example owning the financial budget, affect care seeking patterns. Geography itself has been reported to influence care seeking patterns, with patient reported proximity to the biomedical care center as a determining factor (Liu et al., 2019 ; Rutebemberwa et al., 2020 ). Our data did not allow an ascertainment of geographical distance as a determinant for gender differences.…”

District division administrative disaggregation data framework for monitoring leaving no one behind in the National Health Insurance Fund of Sudan: achieving sustainable development goals in 2030

“…This WHO framework provides national information about equity regarding the utilization of essential health services between average coverage and full coverage and between rich and poor [39]. Research studies disaggregate the data based on gender [40,41], socioeconomic status [42][43][44][45][46], income [47][48][49], marital status [50], residence [51], ethnicity [52], and education [53,54]. This disaggregation facilitates the detection of inequity in health between advantaged and disadvantaged groups.…”

District-level health system strengthening for universal health coverage: evidence from a longitudinal cohort study in rural Madagascar, 2014-2018

“…53 Our local results provide a more positive picture than equivalent national analyses in countries undergoing UHC and other health reforms, which showed mixed results in addressing wealth inequalities. [11][12][13] While Ghana observed progressive convergence between groups, 12 inequalities persisted in Kenya and Rwanda. 11 13 Among all the indicators assessed in our setting, antenatal care (4+ visits) was the only one for which both economic and geographical inequalities increased.…”

“…1 8 9 Key priorities of these initiatives are to improve aggregate health outcomes while reducing health inequalities. [10][11][12][13] Multilateral health organisations such as the WHO and UNICEF have developed toolkits (eg, HEAT and EQUIST) to promote the adoption of equity analyses into national health planning and evaluation. 14 15 These macro-level approaches allow progress across countries to be compared, providing insights into which policies may affect change.…”