2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.21.449219
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing neuromodulation effects of theta burst stimulation to the prefrontal cortex using TMS-evoked potentials

Abstract: Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is capable of non-invasively modulating cortical excitability. TBS is gaining popularity as a therapeutic tool for psychiatric disorders such as depression, in which the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is the main therapeutic target. However, the neuromodulatory effects of TBS on prefrontal regions remain unclear. An emerging tool to assess neuromodulation in non-motor regions is concurrent transcranial magnetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted an a priori power analysis using the program G*Power 3.1 with the power set at 0.8 and α = 0.05, d = 0.6 (independent t-test), two-tailed. Adopting a conservative approach, we powered our study to detect a moderate effect size (Cohen's d = 0.6) [22], taking into account the context of neuroscience studies [23]. These results suggest that an N value of approximately 46 is required to achieve appropriate statistical power.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted an a priori power analysis using the program G*Power 3.1 with the power set at 0.8 and α = 0.05, d = 0.6 (independent t-test), two-tailed. Adopting a conservative approach, we powered our study to detect a moderate effect size (Cohen's d = 0.6) [22], taking into account the context of neuroscience studies [23]. These results suggest that an N value of approximately 46 is required to achieve appropriate statistical power.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%