2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing non-specific symptoms in epidemiological studies: Development and validation of the Symptoms and Perceptions (SaP) questionnaire

Abstract: The SaP questionnaire is a reliable and valid self-reported measure of diverse features of NSS and corresponding perceptions. It can also be a useful tool for the identification of multiple somatic symptoms and related disorders in general practice and assessment of psychological problems in epidemiological studies. Further validation of the questionnaire in different samples and settings will establish the promising psychometric properties demonstrated in the present study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the non-response analysis and detailed health characteristics of the respondents have been described in previous publications [24,31,35]. In short, participants were slightly younger, more highly educated and with better perceived health, while there was no difference in terms of gender.…”
Section: Non-response and Descriptive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of the non-response analysis and detailed health characteristics of the respondents have been described in previous publications [24,31,35]. In short, participants were slightly younger, more highly educated and with better perceived health, while there was no difference in terms of gender.…”
Section: Non-response and Descriptive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Number of NSPS (in the past month), duration of NSPS and related healthcare utilization (in the past year) were assessed using 23 items from the recently validated Symptoms and Perceptions scale [35], representing physical symptoms that are often reported in general practice as unexplained. A higher total score in the corresponding assessment methods (range: 0-23, 0-92 and 0-23 respectively) indicates increased report, duration and symptom-related primary care utilization.…”
Section: Self-reported Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of NCR data in this study was approved by the NCR Privacy Review Board. The self-administered survey (Appendix 1) consisted of three topics: 1) a predefined list of health problems experienced during the twelve months preceding the questionnaire, retrieved from Yzermans et al [18]; 2) associated use of health care (visiting a physician or general practitioner) over the last year; 3) personal information including highest completed level of education, current treatment status, and comorbidities. Comorbidity was defined as chronic health problems that patients experienced at the time of completing the survey, including other types of cancer, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, urogenital, musculoskeletal, neurological, metabolic/coagulation, or infectious diseases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At individual level this can be done based on informal conversations with the affected (Jong, D€ uckers, & Van der Velden, 2016a), or more formally through an investigation or professional diagnosis. At community or country level it is possible to perform a rapid health and needs assessment (Korteweg, Van Bokhoven, Yzermans, & Grievink, 2010), a health monitor to follow the development in time of mental and physical health (Yzermans et al, 2009;Yzermans, Baliatsas, Van Dulmen, & Van Kamp, 2016), or an analysis of social media, newspaper, or television broadcasting to understand emotions and perceived PCM-outcomes within local communities (Back, K€ ufner, & Egloff, 2010;Griffin-Padgett & Allison, 2010;Jong & D€ uckers, 2016;Jong et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Sense Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%