2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Normalization Techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only DN2 was suitable when combining the SAW method with four DN methods (DN2-DN4 and DN6) [22]. Only DN9 is considered suitable when combining the ROV method with eight methods (DN2-DN4, DN6, DN7, DN9, DN11, and DN12) [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only DN2 was suitable when combining the SAW method with four DN methods (DN2-DN4 and DN6) [22]. Only DN9 is considered suitable when combining the ROV method with eight methods (DN2-DN4, DN6, DN7, DN9, DN11, and DN12) [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of calculating the greater value of Vi states that the alternative Ai is the best alternative. In other words, the weight of the criterion (w) is multiplied by all the values of each participant (r) for each criterion and added [13].…”
Section: Data Analysis Using Saw Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of controlling CO2 emissions, to achieve the coordinated development of energy, economy and society, we need a reasonable allocation of energy. Therefore, the problem to be studied is a continuous decision-making problem, and a weighted algorithm is adopted [9][10].…”
Section: Carbon Emission Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%