Assessing of supply chain performance by adopting Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) model

Abstract

This paper aims at an assessing of a supply chain performance by adopting the Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) Model. The supply chain activities are divided into five core processes, i.e. plan, source, make, delivery and return. Each level of the SCOR model is weighted using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). The mapping of SCOR Model consists of 5 core processes at 1st level, 21 performance matrices at 2nd level, and 28 Key Performance Indicator (KPI) at 3th level. The result shows that the supply chain performance is 68,231. Referring to the performance indicators, the performance achieved by the supply chain at this time is in the average category. Proposed improvement strategies are designed based on lean supply chain principles, through the implementation of Gemba Kaizen which consists of 17 proposed strategies.

Transmission Mechanism of Post-COVID-19 Emergency Supply Chain Based on Complex Network: An Improved SIR Model

“…In this paper, the index data used in the study of ESC risks at home and abroad are addressed, and the main influencing factors of risks in the ESC network are analyzed from four aspects: reliability of ESC operation process, emergency organizational supportability, completeness of emergency, and the impact degree of emergencies. Among them, the supply chain operation process is divided into five parts: planning, procurement, production and storage, distribution, and reverse logistics according to the supply chain operation reference model (SCOR) [34][35][36][37][38] and the characteristics of ESC. The specific risk factor indicators are shown in Table 2.…”

Analysis And Improvement Of Drug Supply Chain Risk Management Using House Of Risk (HOR) And Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approaches

“…This study looks at one way to choose the priority strategy to be used, the AHP method. The benefit of AHP is that it combines qualitative and quantitative criteria while conducting parallel analysis [9]. The following is a description of the finishing process used in this approach: 1.…”

Procedimento de priorização de indicadores para projetos Kaizen baseado em método multicritério

“…Em conjunto com o Método Kaizen, o AHP tem sido usado para auxiliar na identificação de possibilidades de melhoria em diferentes situações/processos: na cadeia de suprimentos (Prasetyaningsih, Muhamad & Amolina, 2020;Al-Aomar & Hussain, 2019), gestão da qualidade (Silbert, 2019;Nurcahyo, Apriliani, Muslim & Wibowo, 2019) e cadeia de valor presente e futuro (Amin, Mahmood & Kamat, 2019).…”

“…Atualmente, o uso do AHP relacionado a implementação de projetos Kaizen em empresas se dá no lado da demanda, ou seja, a ferramenta é usada para identificar se há necessidade ou não da execução desses tipos de projetos (Prasetyaningsih, Muhamad & Amolina, 2020;Amin, Mahmood & Kamat, 2019;Nurcahyo, Apriliani, Muslim & Wibowo, 2019;Silbert, 2019;Al-Aomar & Hussain, 2019). A partir dessa constatação, verificou-se que há uma carência de estudos que lançam mão da ferramenta no lado da oferta, ou seja, que ajudem a classificar, dentro de um portifólio de opções de projetos Kaizen, aqueles que possuem mais aderência às demandas identificadas.…”