Assessing On-Road Emission Flow Pattern under Car-Following Induced Turbulence Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Numerical Simulation

Abstract

Research assessing on-road emission flow patterns from motor vehicles is essential in monitoring urban air quality, since it helps to mitigate atmospheric pollution levels. To reveal the influence of vehicle induced turbulence (VIT) caused by both front- and rear-vehicles on traffic exhaust and verify the applicability of the simplified line source emission model, a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation was used to investigate the micro-scale vehicle pollutant flow patterns. The simulation results were examined through sensitivity analysis and compared with the field measured carbon monoxide (CO) concentration. Conclusions indicate that the vehicle induced turbulence caused by the airflow blocking effect of both front- and rear-vehicles impedes the diffusion of front-vehicle traffic exhaust, compared with that of the rear vehicle. The front-vehicle isosurface with the CO mass fraction of 0.0012 extended to 6.0 m behind the vehicle, while that of the rear-vehicle extends as far as 12.7 m. But for the entire motorcade, VIT is beneficial to the diffusion of pollutants in car-following situations. Meanwhile, within the range of 9 m behind the rear of the lagging vehicle lies a vehicle induced turbulence zone. Furthermore, the influence of vehicle induced turbulence on traffic exhaust flow pattern is obvious within a range of 1 m on both sides of the vehicle body, where the concentration gradient of on-road emission is larger and contains severe mechanical turbulence. As a result, in the large concentration gradient area of the pollutant flow field, which accounts for 99.85% of the total concentration gradient, using the line source models to represent the on-road emission might introduce considerable errors due to neglecting the influence of vehicle induced turbulence. Findings of this study may shed lights on predicting emission concentrations in multiple locations by selecting appropriate on-road emission source models.

Modeling Emission Flow Pattern of a Single Cruising Vehicle on Urban Streets with CFD Simulation and Wind Tunnel Validation

“…The operational model is based on numerical solutions of differential equations, which are combined with the semi-empirical formula obtained from observations and wind tunnel simulations, such as the box model, the operational street pollution model (OSPM), and so on [5]. During recent years, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation has been used to model pollutant dispersion in a microscopic environment [6]. The results of a CFD numerical simulation can be compared with corresponding data from field measurements and a wind tunnel experiment.…”

Computational Fluid Dynamics Models to Estimate Pedestrian Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution: A Review

“…The calibration of these sensors should be performed for each measurement and ideally compared with data from monitoring stations. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Monitoring stations…”

Design of a Motorcycle Steering Damper for a Safer Ride

“…A 3D multiphysics finite element analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of these various factors on damper performance in order to determine its optimal configuration. The coupled multiphysics analysis is based on computational fluid dynamics [48,49] and magnetic field simulation.…”