2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-021-01244-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing patent foramen ovale on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with TEE, the sensitivity of CCT for PFO diagnosis in a single-center study was 85.3% and the specificity 33.3%, with a negative predictive value of 33%. 28 Notably, 1 out of 7 patients with PFO diagnosed on TEE were missed by cardiac computed tomography (CT). Single-phase CCT is performed during a fraction of the cardiac cycle, usually the end-systole or mid-diastole.…”
Section: Cardiac Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with TEE, the sensitivity of CCT for PFO diagnosis in a single-center study was 85.3% and the specificity 33.3%, with a negative predictive value of 33%. 28 Notably, 1 out of 7 patients with PFO diagnosed on TEE were missed by cardiac computed tomography (CT). Single-phase CCT is performed during a fraction of the cardiac cycle, usually the end-systole or mid-diastole.…”
Section: Cardiac Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, in some cases, the presence of PFO can facilitate the LA access. Ziong et al considers CT to be a practical and efficient alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for PFO diagnosis [50]. Indeed, pre-procedural CT scan allows to accurately plan this element of the procedure and to decide whether to apply intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or TEE in cases of anticipated difficulties.…”
Section: Interatrial Septummentioning
confidence: 99%