Assessing patients’ involvement in decision making during the nutritional consultation with a dietitian

Abstract

Background Shared decision making (SDM) represents an interesting approach to optimize the impact of dietary treatment, but there is no evidence that SDM is commonly integrated into diet-related health care.

Clinicians’ Involvement of Patients in Decision Making. A Video Based Comparison of Their Behavior in Public vs. Private Practice

“…This is consistent with the literature [13], [15], [16], [17]. The association was not stronger perhaps because study duration reflects more the structural problems of delivering care in the settings studied (e.g.…”

Patient‐centred care to improve dietetic practice: an integrative review

“…Participant numbers for all 27 studies ranged from seven to 1158; most ( n = 24) were between nine and 258, with the exception of one larger study ( n = 1158) . The majority of studies ( n = 22) were published between the years 2009 and 2016 . Studies were mostly conducted in Europe ( n = 7) , Canada ( n = 6) , the USA ( n = 6) and Australia ( n = 6) .…”

“…Only four studies explicitly referred to PCC in their aims , four mentioned shared decision‐making and one mentioned the dietitian–patient relationship , both critical components of PCC . Several studies explored aspects of PCC indirectly; for example, by gaining consensus on dietitians’ perceptions of the importance of practice activities , skills and attributes , evaluation methods competence and performance criteria , quality of information available , communication skills and recommendations for overcoming patients’ barriers to dietary adherence in patients with diabetes .…”

“…Studies used a broad range of methodological designs, including qualitative focus group and/or interviews (n = 7) (22,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) , descriptive quantitative studies (n = 13) and intervention studies (n = 5). A variety of descriptive quantitative designs were utilised, including Delphi studies (n = 3) (37)(38)(39) , observational studies (n = 2) (23,40) and questionnaires/surveys (n = 5) (41)(42)(43)(44)(45) . Three sequential qualitative-quantitative studies were also included (31,46,47) .…”

“…Participant numbers for all 27 studies ranged from seven to 1158; most (n = 24) were between nine and 258, with the exception of one larger study (n = 1158) (44) . The majority of studies (n = 22) were published between the years 2009 and 2016 (23,(31)(32)(33)(34)(36)(37)(38)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)46,48,(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55) . Studies were mostly conducted in Europe (n = 7) (33)(34)(35)40,41,44,52) , Canada (n = 6) (23,32,38,39,42,43) , the USA (n = 6) (22,37,45,(49)(50)(51) and Australia (n = 6) (31,36,46,47,53,54) .…”