2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5031625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing performance of flaw characterization methods through uncertainty propagation

Abstract: Abstract. In this work, we assess the inversion performance in terms of crack characterization and localization based on synthetic signals associated to ultrasonic and eddy current physics. More precisely, two different standard iterative inversion algorithms are used to minimize the discrepancy between measurements (i.e., the tested data) and simulations. Furthermore, in order to speed up the computational time and get rid of the computational burden often associated to iterative inversion algorithms, we repl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A type of more general inversion procedures iteratively update the defect geometry according to the difference between the actual and predicted measurements until a satisfactory agreement is achieved [23], [24]. Metamodels (or surrogate models) can speed up the inversion process by enabling fast evaluation of the forward model [25] and are recently used as tools for propagation of uncertainties [26]. Machine learning (ML) algorithms [27] offer another possibility to address the inverse problem, in which measurements from a number of known defects are used to train a suitable classifier [28] or regressor [29], [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A type of more general inversion procedures iteratively update the defect geometry according to the difference between the actual and predicted measurements until a satisfactory agreement is achieved [23], [24]. Metamodels (or surrogate models) can speed up the inversion process by enabling fast evaluation of the forward model [25] and are recently used as tools for propagation of uncertainties [26]. Machine learning (ML) algorithms [27] offer another possibility to address the inverse problem, in which measurements from a number of known defects are used to train a suitable classifier [28] or regressor [29], [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%