Assessing polycentric urban development in Shanghai, China, with detailed passive mobile phone data

Abstract

Despite growing studies on the distinction between morphological and functional polycentricity, the present methods for identifying polycentricity often focus on the morphological dimension due to a lack of information about intra-urban functional flows, and are limited by the multifarious nature of people’s spatiotemporal interactions. This study proposes a new approach, examining the degree of polycentricity in Shanghai at the intra-urban level using passive mobile phone data. A series of polycentricity indicators are used and are benchmarked against previous studies. Notably, we found that people’s daily movements within a subcenter indicate that morphological polycentricity is also at play in Shanghai. We conclude that morphological and functional polycentricity may coexist at the intra-urban level, and that a mobile phone data approach can offer an alternative method to elucidate both the morphological and functional features of subcenters.

Exploring Employment Spatial Structure Based on Mobile Phone Signaling Data: The Case of Shenzhen, China

“…The collection of data that represents functional linkages, such as population movements within cities, is a prerequisite for measuring spatial structure from functional perspective. The progress of information and communications technology and emergence of big spatial data, such as bus smart card data, taxi GPS trajectories, and mobile phone signaling data, have provided new possibilities for obtaining information about people's mobility activities [15][16][17][18][19]. Compared with traditional survey data, these new datasets have a much higher accuracy to provide a better tool for measuring urban spatial structure.…”

Whether polycentric spatial structure is conducive to regional coordinated development: A study on urban agglomerations in China

“…Therefore, existing studies can be divided into two main categories: morphological polycentricity and functional polycentricity (Barton, 1978; De Goei et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2019). Morphological polycentricity describes the geospatial distribution characteristics of material elements (Han et al., 2022; Long et al., 2022; Meijers & Burger, 2010; Parr, 2004; Wang et al., 2021); Functional polycentric places more emphasis on the functional links between different centers or the spatial division of labor among the centers (Green, 2007; Liu et al., 2020; Veneri, 2010; Xiao et al., 2021). Proponents of the functional polycentricity generally claim that centers without functional links would not form a polycentric system (Burger & Meijers, 2012; ESPON 1.1.1, 2004).…”

Reflection on Guangzhou’s Strategic Spatial Planning: Current Status, Conflicts, and Dilemmas

“…It also encompasses comparative studies of the current status of urban strategic spatial planning and implementation [24]. The research data for such studies include static data, such as the distribution of points of interest (POI) [25], population distribution [26], and business locations [27], as well as dynamic interconnected data, including commuting patterns. For instance, Deng [25] identified spillover development patterns in Shenyang based on POI data.…”