1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing population genetic structure of sorghum landraces from North-western Morocco using allozyme and microsatellite markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
26
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultivated sorghum had a mean regression slope (blog) value of -0.015 (P < 0.001) and a coefficient of determination value (r 2 ) of 0.045, while wild sorghum had a blog value of -0.017 (P < 0.001), and a r 2 value of 0.055. Djè et al (1999). In the wild sorghum gene pool, the mean gene diversity estimated for Kenya across the 24 SSR markers (H e =0.69) was higher than that estimated for a set of accessions selected to represent a wide geographic sampling in Africa (H e =0.59) by Casa et al (2005).…”
Section: Spatial Genetic Structurementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cultivated sorghum had a mean regression slope (blog) value of -0.015 (P < 0.001) and a coefficient of determination value (r 2 ) of 0.045, while wild sorghum had a blog value of -0.017 (P < 0.001), and a r 2 value of 0.055. Djè et al (1999). In the wild sorghum gene pool, the mean gene diversity estimated for Kenya across the 24 SSR markers (H e =0.69) was higher than that estimated for a set of accessions selected to represent a wide geographic sampling in Africa (H e =0.59) by Casa et al (2005).…”
Section: Spatial Genetic Structurementioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is especially needed for Africa, the center of origin and primary diversification of sorghum. Attempts have been made to use in situ collected samples but such studies have been limited to separate investigations of genetic diversity and structure in either cultivated sorghum (Djè et al 1998;Djè et al 1999;Ayana et al 2000b;Ayana et al 2001;Ghebru et al 2002;Barnaud et al 2007;Deu et al 2008;Sagnard et al 2008;Barro-Kondombo et al 2010) or its closest wild relatives (Ayana et al 2000a). Our study applied microsatellite markers to analyse cultivated sorghum and its closest wild relatives sampled from different growing regions in Kenya, in order to elucidate patterns of diversity within and among the two congeners, and to shed more light on their genetic and evolutionary relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Benin, although AFLP markers were used in genetic characterization of sorghum local varieties (Kayodé et al, 2006), it is the first time SSR markers were used for sorghum germplasm analysis. Microsatellite markers when compared with AFLP markers, they are specific, codominant and multi-allelic and well known to allow a good discrimination of closely related sorghum accessions (Djè et al, 1999;Smith et al, 2000;Ghebru et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Morjan and Rieseberg (2004), gene flow < 1 is considered to be low whereas N m = 1 is considered to be moderate. Moderate or relatively low levels of gene flow can significantly reduce loss of genetic diversity (Djè et al, 1999;Aguilar et al, 2008). The high level of gene flow observed may be attributed to an exchange of genetic materials (Bhawna et al, 2014) between farmers leading to low levels of genetic differentiation (Bhawna et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%