2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2003.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing practical significance of the proportional odds assumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we consider only a subset of the variables from that study, and we do not aim to give a complete assessment of the factors that influence aftercare placement. Neither do we perform formal testing of the proportional odds assumption —a necessary task in real‐life applications. Hosmer et al .…”
Section: Clinical Example: Determinants Of Aftercare Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we consider only a subset of the variables from that study, and we do not aim to give a complete assessment of the factors that influence aftercare placement. Neither do we perform formal testing of the proportional odds assumption —a necessary task in real‐life applications. Hosmer et al .…”
Section: Clinical Example: Determinants Of Aftercare Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web Table 3 presents the 1%, 5%, and 10% rejection rates of the tests. We ran simulations using a single continuous covariate with the same coefficients as in models (11), (12), and (13). The results for the C g tests (Web Tables 4-6) were similar to those of Web Tables 1-3.…”
Section: The Models Used To Investigate the Null Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is lower than the standard of 0.05, we felt than multinomial logistic regression unnecessarily obscured our analyses by comparing nominal categories rather than ordered categories. Simulation models by Kim (2003) show that rejection of the null hypothesis for the proportional odds assumption does not have practical applications for large samples. Moreover, substantively similar results were found using both OLS and multinomial regression (figures available upon request).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers suggested that a significance test for model goodness of fit is not sufficient for comparing the baseline-category logits model with the more parsimonious models, such as proportional odds or adjacent-categories logits models [37,38]. Statistical significance does not necessarily imply clinical or public health significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%