2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing pragmatic communication in children with Down syndrome

Abstract: By the age of six children with DS experience significantly impaired pragmatic communication, with a clear profile of relative strengths and weaknesses. The study highlights the need to teach children with DS pragmatic skills as a component of communication, alongside language content and form.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
33
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Priority is given to the suprasegmental features over segmental ones. Although the intelligibility of the utterances of speakers with Down syndrome is seriously affected [7], prosodic mistakes are what is mainly responsible for pragmatic failures in spoken communication, and this can lead to insecurities and low self esteem in people with Down syndrome. Therefore, we argue that any improvement in the suprasegmental domain will lead to an improvement in communication.…”
Section: Game Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Priority is given to the suprasegmental features over segmental ones. Although the intelligibility of the utterances of speakers with Down syndrome is seriously affected [7], prosodic mistakes are what is mainly responsible for pragmatic failures in spoken communication, and this can lead to insecurities and low self esteem in people with Down syndrome. Therefore, we argue that any improvement in the suprasegmental domain will lead to an improvement in communication.…”
Section: Game Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although lexical acquisition is delayed, difficulties with morphology and syntax appear to be more pronounced (e.g., incorrect use of morphemes; use of short sentences) [6]. With regard to pragmatics, individuals with Down syndrome have trouble producing and understanding questions and emotions, signaling turn-taking, or keeping to topics in conversation; while the study of Smith et al [7] demonstrated that children with Down syndrome are impaired relative to norms from typically developing children in all areas of pragmatics. At the phonological level, speech intelligibility is seriously damaged by the presence of errors on producing some phonemes, the loss of consonants and the simplification of syllables [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far less is known about the pragmatic language abilities, or social use of language, of individuals with DS, particularly for individuals who have progressed beyond pre-linguistic babbling or single-word use. The limited literature points to a complex pragmatic language profile of relative strengths and difficulties, varying by sub-domain assessed and comparison group (e.g., autism spectrum disorder and fragile X syndrome; typical development) used (Abbeduto et al, 2008; Lee et al, 2017; Martin, Losh, Estigarribia, Sideris, & Roberts, 2013; Roberts et al, 2007; Smith, Naess, & Jarrold, 2017). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith, Naess and Jarrold (2017) study a group of 29, eight year old children with DS and discovered a profile of relative strengths and weaknesses that was found in the children with DS (Smith, Naess & Jarrold, 2017); the area of nonverbal communication was significantly stronger, while the area of understanding context was significantly poorer, relative to the other areas of pragmatics assessed in these children. Relationships between areas of pragmatics and other linguistic areas, as well as aspects of vocabulary and social functioning, were observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%