Assessing pretreatment reactor scaling through empirical analysis

Abstract

BackgroundPretreatment is a critical step in the biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Due to the complexity of the physicochemical transformations involved, predictively scaling up technology from bench- to pilot-scale is difficult. This study examines how pretreatment effectiveness under nominally similar reaction conditions is influenced by pretreatment reactor design and scale using four different pretreatment reaction systems ranging from a 3 g batch reactor to a 10 dry-ton/days continuous reactor. The reactor systems examined were an automated solvent extractor (ASE), steam explosion reactor (SER), ZipperClave®Reactor (ZCR), and large continuous horizontal screw reactor (LHR). To our knowledge, this is the first such study performed on pretreatment reactors across a range of reaction conditions and at different reactor scales.ResultsThe comparative pretreatment performance results obtained for each reactor system were used to develop response surface models for total xylose yield after pretreatment and total sugar yield after pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis. Near- and very-near-optimal regions were defined as the set of conditions that the model identified as producing yields within one and two standard deviations of the optimum yield. Optimal conditions identified in the smallest scale system (the ASE) were within the near-optimal region of the largest scale reactor system evaluated. The maximum total sugar yields for the ASE and LHR were , while was the optimum observed in the ZipperClave.ConclusionsThe optimum condition identified using the automated and less costly to operate ASE system was within the very-near-optimal space for the total xylose yield of both the ZCR and the LHR, and was within the near-optimal space for total sugar yield for the LHR. This indicates that the ASE is a good tool for cost effectively finding near-optimal conditions for operating pilot-scale systems. Additionally, using a severity factor approach to optimization was found to be inadequate compared to a multivariate optimization method. Finally, the ASE and the LHR were able to enable significantly higher total sugar yields after enzymatic hydrolysis relative to the ZCR, despite having similar optimal conditions and total xylose yields. This underscores the importance of mechanical disruption during pretreatment to improvement of enzymatic digestibility.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0620-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Engineering aspects of hydrothermal pretreatment: From batch to continuous operation, scale-up and pilot reactor under biorefinery concept

“…The scale-up in the process development is often based on the severity factor (Overend et al, 1987), since it converts the two most important process parameters temperature and time into one reaction ordinate. Results from batch steam pretreatment can be nearly directly converted to SCR performance (Heitz et al, 1991;Lischeske et al, 2016).…”

The Effect of Biomass Densification on Structural Sugar Release and Yield in Biofuel Feedstock and Feedstock Blends

“…We have recently published a study comparing the results of PT/EH experiments at different scales using different pretreatment reactors [18]. In that work, we demonstrated that because the pretreatment reaction is a complex multiphase reaction, optimal conditions vary among pretreatment reactors, and simple strategies such as matching reactor temperatures and residence times between reactors are unlikely to produce similar results.…”

Techno‐economic analysis of the valorization of brewers spent grains: production of xylitol and xylo‐oligosaccharides

“…About 74.2% of the BSG xylan is extracted in the hydrolysate as XOS oligomers (Table 2). The process conditions and yields assumed were reasonable for screw reactor HTT of BSG 48 because they were confirmed in bench‐scale stirred reactors and pilot‐scale steam explosion reactors. The hydrolysate is separated from the cellulignin by a centrifuge at 80 °C to minimize risk of precipitating XOS 49 and the cellulignin is washed using a 2:1 ratio to minimize to recovery (>95%) of solubilized oligomers 50 .…”