1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
357
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(366 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
357
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3) using the SWISS-MODEL online server (Guex and Peitsch, 1997;Schwede et al, 2003;Arnold et al, 2006) and the NAC α -NAC β heterodimer as the template structure. We assessed packing quality of this TβNAC model using the atomic empirical mean force potential implemented in the program ANOLEA (Melo and Feytmans, 1998) and using the program Protein & Cell PROCHECK (Laskowski et al, 2005). The overall stereochemical quality was good, and energy environment for majority residues were favorable (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) using the SWISS-MODEL online server (Guex and Peitsch, 1997;Schwede et al, 2003;Arnold et al, 2006) and the NAC α -NAC β heterodimer as the template structure. We assessed packing quality of this TβNAC model using the atomic empirical mean force potential implemented in the program ANOLEA (Melo and Feytmans, 1998) and using the program Protein & Cell PROCHECK (Laskowski et al, 2005). The overall stereochemical quality was good, and energy environment for majority residues were favorable (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANOLEA mean force potential were used to evaluate the local quality of the structural models. 38 The stereochemical plausibility of the models was evaluated via comparisons of Ramachandran plots calculated for experimental and modeled data (Supplementary Information section, Figure S2). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMSD values ranged from 0.506 Å to 2.457 Å. The final structure was further evaluated for stereo-chemical structural quality through various standard tools such as RAMPAGE [44], PROSA [53] and ANOLEA.…”
Section: Structure Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%