“…These limitations include: (a) a focus on clinical diagnosis (e.g., Conners, ) and limited examination of frequent, but problematic behaviours seen among children with subclinical problems (Goodman, ); (b) in addition, most measures focus on older children with limited screening tools available for children under age 5 (Bagner, Rodríguez, Blake, Linares, & Carter, ; Briggs‐Gowan et al., ). Furthermore, most measures: (c) take a deficit approach and do not examine behavioural competencies (Tsang, Wong, & Lo, ); (d) a focus on only one type of behaviour (e.g., Kovacs, ) or only on internalising (e.g., Spence, ) or externalising (e.g., Eyberg & Pincus, ) behaviour. The other problematic issues with the existing measures include: (e) low to moderate estimates of internal consistency (e.g., Strengths and Diffiuclites Questionnaires .51–.76; Smedje, Broman, Hetta, & von Knorring, ); (f) measures such as the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (Achenbach, ) that are lengthy and time consuming for parents to complete (Goodman & Scott, ); and (g) licensing fees, which can place limits on dissemination in large population studies (e.g., Eyberg & Pincus, ; Goodman, ).…”