2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91241-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Quality in Human- and Machine-Generated Subtitles and Captions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under "acceptability", errors of grammar, spelling and idiomaticity are evaluated; and for "readability" considerations include segmentation and spotting, punctuation, and reading speed and line length. Doherty and Kruger (2018) have pointed out that "[u]nlike traditional TQA models and metrics, assessment in AVT is largely based on prescriptive industry guidelines" (p. 182). Summarizing the commonalities found in the various reviews, reports, and guidelines, they discovered that the general principles that underpin good quality in AVT are accuracy, presentation, and timing.…”
Section: Subtitling Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under "acceptability", errors of grammar, spelling and idiomaticity are evaluated; and for "readability" considerations include segmentation and spotting, punctuation, and reading speed and line length. Doherty and Kruger (2018) have pointed out that "[u]nlike traditional TQA models and metrics, assessment in AVT is largely based on prescriptive industry guidelines" (p. 182). Summarizing the commonalities found in the various reviews, reports, and guidelines, they discovered that the general principles that underpin good quality in AVT are accuracy, presentation, and timing.…”
Section: Subtitling Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying Sperber and Wilson's Relevance Theory to subtitling, Bogucki (2022) has proposed that the rationale behind the process of decision-making in the practice of AVT can be explained by the interplay between relevance, communicative intention, and processing effort. Empirical research in this field focuses on the audience's visual attention and cognitive load and also their reception of subtitles (Doherty & Kruger, 2018). The research methods employed include surveys, questionnaires, eye-tracking, and electroencephalography (EEG).…”
Section: Subtitling Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figure 1). For consistent generation of keywords for the abbreviated transcript, the full transcript was shortened using the linguistic techniques of reformulation, condensation, and omission as suggested by Doherty and Kruger [11]. For example, the sentence "One more concept to be familiar with is called look ahead and look behind matching" from the full transcript was abbreviated as "look ahead and look behind matching. "…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study strengthens the point that the socio-linguistic level of the speaker may affect their ability to use speech recognition accurately. Doherty and Kruger (2018) looked into the quality of human and machine-generated captioning systems. They examined the various industry standards developed to guarantee that viewers are presented with high-quality subtitling and captioning regardless of language or disability.…”
Section: Auto-generated Caption Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%