2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5121060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing railway accident risk through event tree analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crawford [5] categorizes factors into human error, design errors, control room errors, and maintenance errors. Khalid et al [6] suggest a division based on error, inexperience, or fatigue. Rungskunroch et al [7] present a more comprehensive classification with seven groups, including driver error, signal operator error, infrastructure failure, equipment failure, human error, natural causes, and contributory factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crawford [5] categorizes factors into human error, design errors, control room errors, and maintenance errors. Khalid et al [6] suggest a division based on error, inexperience, or fatigue. Rungskunroch et al [7] present a more comprehensive classification with seven groups, including driver error, signal operator error, infrastructure failure, equipment failure, human error, natural causes, and contributory factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Dinmohammadi et al [16], one of the open and challenging areas still available in railway infrastructure research is the need for a practical methodology that can cope with the uncertainty of information for analyzing and mitigating the risks associated with the failure mechanism of the railway infrastructure components at a system level. The currently available methods used in the railway industry include the fault tree analysis method [18,19], the event tree analysis method [20], the Monte Carlo simulation model [21], the consequence analysis method [22], and the equivalent fatality analysis method [23]. These methods, however, all rely heavily on the availability and accuracy of reliability-related data, which in most cases are not readily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect to be taken into consideration while designing LNG-related scenarios is the context of an incident. Such incidents might be elaborated for LNG storage tanks [ 17 ], pipelines, railway or road transportation [ 18 ]. As already argued, there are increasing quantities of LNG in use all over Europe, including LNG transportation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%