2021
DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1932890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing respectful maternity care in a fragile, conflict-affected context: Observations from a 2016 national assessment in Afghanistan

Abstract: evidence on experiences and perceptions of care in pregnancy and childbirth in conflict-affected settings is limited. We interviewed 561 maternity care providers and observed 413 antenatal care consultations, 671 births, and 393 postnatal care consultations at public health facilities across afghanistan. We found that healthcare providers work under stressed conditions with insufficient support, and most women receive mixed quality care. Understanding socio-cultural and contextual factors underpinning acceptan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our study showed that 60.8% of the providers did not consider the application of fundal pressure during delivery as a form of mistreatment. Based on the available evidence, the use of fundal pressure during vaginal birth is very common in hospitals [43][44][45][46][47][48]. A systematic review showed that the prevalence of fundal pressure ranged from 0.6 to 69.2% globally [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of our study showed that 60.8% of the providers did not consider the application of fundal pressure during delivery as a form of mistreatment. Based on the available evidence, the use of fundal pressure during vaginal birth is very common in hospitals [43][44][45][46][47][48]. A systematic review showed that the prevalence of fundal pressure ranged from 0.6 to 69.2% globally [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no signi cant association between age at critical life events and PNC. The limitations in access to PNC aside; the low quality of such services is one of the discouraging factors in the utilization of it in poor-resourced settings such as Afghanistan (35). In addition, older mothers-those with high scores in age at critical life eventsoften have more exposure to such services, and therefore; low quality of PNC could be a stronger disappointing factor for this age group as compared to younger groups abd this could further reduce the utilization of PNC by this age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explanatory variables were selected by reviewing the relevant literature in the context of 13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The selected variables included were mother's age (≤ 19 years, 20-34 years, and ≥ 35 years), mother's education (no formal education, primary education, secondary education, and higher education), mother's formal work engagement (yes, no), number of children ever born (1-2 children and > 2 children), husband's age (≤ 30, 31-40, ≥ 41), husband's education (no formal education, primary education, secondary education, and higher education), wealth quintile (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest), mass media exposure (no exposure, moderate exposure, higher exposure), number of antenatal healthcare services visits (no visit, 1-3 visits, ≥ 4 visits), place of residence (urban, rural), and district of residence (Mymensingh, Rajshahi, Rangpur).…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of RMC has been observed to be higher among illiterate mothers, those residing in rural areas, and those from disadvantaged socio-demographic backgrounds [9,10,13,[16][17][18]. These ndings are echoed in the limited available studies in South Asian countries [8, [19][20][21][22]. However, to date, no studies have been conducted in Bangladesh to assess the extent of RMC, D&A, and their determinants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%