2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
143
3
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
143
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size of 123 had a maximum standard error of 0.045. The acceptable margin of error is 5%; thus a sample size that achieves standard errors lower than 0.05 is acceptable [66]. A total of nine visitors did not respond to the survey (Buddha Jayanti Smarak park = 2; Lodhi garden = 2; Safdarjung's tomb = 4, and Bhuli Bhatiyari park = 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size of 123 had a maximum standard error of 0.045. The acceptable margin of error is 5%; thus a sample size that achieves standard errors lower than 0.05 is acceptable [66]. A total of nine visitors did not respond to the survey (Buddha Jayanti Smarak park = 2; Lodhi garden = 2; Safdarjung's tomb = 4, and Bhuli Bhatiyari park = 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide many benefits such as contributing to ecosystem services and human well-being, and providing important habitats for wildlife (Bolund and Hunhammar 1999, as cited in Davies et al 2009, Fernández-Juricic and Jokimäki 2001, Stagoll et al 2010, Dobbs et al 2011, Millward and Sabir 2011, Nordh et al 2011, Zheng et al 2013), however they are frequently removed by residents for a variety of reasons, with the result that the urban forest is highly dynamic ). This dynamic turnover may be the reason behind the higher proportions of potentially tall trees we found in the 2 -5 m height category, if trees are more likely to be removed when they become tall.…”
Section: Tree Community Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the Stated Preference (SP) method has been proposed for weight allocation. It was originally designed for marketing studies of consumption preference, and it was later introduced to house selection, city planning and policy making in the 1970s (Nordh, Alalouch, & Hartig, 2011;Knight and Menchik, 1974). Currently, the SP method is mostly applied in the field of transportation.…”
Section: Sp-based Weight Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%