1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19981115)19:14<1623::aid-jcc8>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing search strategies for flexible docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…com) platform. [15][16][17] The docking results are reported energy as score. It means that the higher score indicates the more favorable docking model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…com) platform. [15][16][17] The docking results are reported energy as score. It means that the higher score indicates the more favorable docking model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] This algorithm assumes a rigid protein and permits only the ligand to be flexible. Input Site Sphere parameter specifies a sphere around the center of the binding site, where the CDOCKER experiment is to be performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vieth et al [21] presented an ad hoc "efficiency" measure to evaluate the success of docking. Most methods judge success by conformations that are within a given tolerance, typically 1 to 1.5 A RMSD away from the crystallographic structure.…”
Section: Testing and Evaluating Docking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%