2017
DOI: 10.1177/1079063216686119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Sexual Interest in Children Using the Go/No-Go Association Test

Abstract: Abstract:The present study investigated whether a latency-based Go/No-Go Association Task (GNAT) could be used as an indirect measure of sexual interest in children. A sample 29 individuals with a history of exclusive extrafamilial offenses against a child and 15 individuals with either a history of exclusive intrafamilial or mixed offenses (i.e., against both adults and children) were recruited from a treatment center in the US. Also, a sample of 26 non-offenders was recruited from a university in the UK. All… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally developed to identify implicit racist attitudes, the Implicit Association Test [IAT (132) Convergent validity was supported by correlations with VTmeasures in few studies, self-report, and sexual offense history variables (r ranging from r = .27 to r = .30) (133). In an adapted IAT, the go/no-go association task (GNAT, a combination of the IAT and the go/no-go response inhibition task) Bartels and colleagues (134) could distinguish between individuals with a history of exclusive extrafamilial sexual offenses against children and those with exclusive intrafamilial offenses or offenses against both children and adults (N = 70) with good discrimination accuracy (AUC = .71, p < .007). However, only partial support was found for convergent validity between the GNAT and questionnaires on sexual thoughts and fantasies (134).…”
Section: Behavioral Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Originally developed to identify implicit racist attitudes, the Implicit Association Test [IAT (132) Convergent validity was supported by correlations with VTmeasures in few studies, self-report, and sexual offense history variables (r ranging from r = .27 to r = .30) (133). In an adapted IAT, the go/no-go association task (GNAT, a combination of the IAT and the go/no-go response inhibition task) Bartels and colleagues (134) could distinguish between individuals with a history of exclusive extrafamilial sexual offenses against children and those with exclusive intrafamilial offenses or offenses against both children and adults (N = 70) with good discrimination accuracy (AUC = .71, p < .007). However, only partial support was found for convergent validity between the GNAT and questionnaires on sexual thoughts and fantasies (134).…”
Section: Behavioral Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an adapted IAT, the go/no-go association task (GNAT, a combination of the IAT and the go/no-go response inhibition task) Bartels and colleagues (134) could distinguish between individuals with a history of exclusive extrafamilial sexual offenses against children and those with exclusive intrafamilial offenses or offenses against both children and adults (N = 70) with good discrimination accuracy (AUC = .71, p < .007). However, only partial support was found for convergent validity between the GNAT and questionnaires on sexual thoughts and fantasies (134).…”
Section: Behavioral Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-report measures of sexual fantasy can be viewed as direct indications of one's level of sexual interest. 34 Although self-report is considered susceptible to socially desirable responding, it is often used for the assessment of sexual interest in children 35e37 -probably due to its simple and economical implementation. In addition, it can be assumed that guaranteeing anonymity (eg, within an online survey) enhances truthful responding.…”
Section: Sexual Fantasies Involving Prepubescent or Pubescent Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1This quantitative review also includes measures that do not fall within the primary categories, including priming measures (e.g., Van Leeuwen et al, 2013), eye tracking (e.g., Fromberger et al, 2012), and variants of the IAT, such as the Single Category IAT (e.g., Hempel et al, 2013), Go/No-Go Association Test (GNAT; Bartels et al, 2018), and Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP; Dawson et al, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%