2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-019-04246-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Social Communication and Collaboration in Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Intelligent Collaborative Virtual Environments

Abstract: Existing literature regarding social communication outcomes of interventions in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) depends upon human raters, with limited generalizability to real world settings.Terms of use and reuse: academic research for non-commercial purposes, see here for full terms. https://www.springer.com/aamterms-v1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it is preferable to have less attrition, more complete cases, and a primary outcome that is more sensitive to potential improvement. Although observational measures are desirable to document treatment response in a more objective way than interviews with informants who are aware of treatment condition assignment, alternative approaches for objective assessment of autism-related symptoms in children with ASD have been developed and could be considered in future RCTs (e.g., Ness et al, 2019; Usher et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it is preferable to have less attrition, more complete cases, and a primary outcome that is more sensitive to potential improvement. Although observational measures are desirable to document treatment response in a more objective way than interviews with informants who are aware of treatment condition assignment, alternative approaches for objective assessment of autism-related symptoms in children with ASD have been developed and could be considered in future RCTs (e.g., Ness et al, 2019; Usher et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of a few studies (Jyoti & Lahiri, 2020;Halabi et al, 2017;Bozgeyikli et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2020), where participants were trained in an automated technology system, in all the other studies the interventions were implemented in the presence of a human factor, namely a mediator, facilitator, trainer, communication partner or provider of prompts, instructions and feedback, who modified the interventions as part of an individualized educational process. The type, frequency and quality of human intervention and unique characteristics of each individual with ASD may affect the effectiveness of the features of each form technology, and explain, in part, the differences in performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above VR social skill training systems, many other VR-driven platforms have also proved to be efficacious in enhancing social functioning and social understanding in ASD, such as Virtual Environment for Social Information Processing (VESIP) [117] and collaborative virtual environment (CVE)-based social interaction platforms including iSocial [118] and CVE-based puzzle games [119][120][121].…”
Section: Social Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%