2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11205753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing (Social-Ecological) Systems Thinking by Evaluating Cognitive Maps

Abstract: Systems thinking (ST) skills are often the foundation of sustainability science curricula. Though ST skill sets are used as a basic approach to reasoning about complex environmental problems, there are gaps in our understanding regarding the best ways to promote and assess ST learning in classrooms. Since ST learning provides Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) students' important skills and awareness to participate in environmental problem-solving, addressing these gaps is an important ST… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The general level of the undergraduate students' environmental awareness is 57.6%, and for the graduate students, it is 63.6%, which is an indicator of a sufficient level of development. This development level of the civil engineering students' environmental awareness in DonNACEA (Ukraine) is similar to the results emanating from studies conducted by Edström et al (2020), Miñano Rubio et al (2019, Chau (2007), Mudrak (2017), Poleshchuk et al (2015), Pubule et al (2019), Lambrechts et al (2019), Maslennikova and Gibadulina (2019), Gray et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The general level of the undergraduate students' environmental awareness is 57.6%, and for the graduate students, it is 63.6%, which is an indicator of a sufficient level of development. This development level of the civil engineering students' environmental awareness in DonNACEA (Ukraine) is similar to the results emanating from studies conducted by Edström et al (2020), Miñano Rubio et al (2019, Chau (2007), Mudrak (2017), Poleshchuk et al (2015), Pubule et al (2019), Lambrechts et al (2019), Maslennikova and Gibadulina (2019), Gray et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Often, this means that a single-view solution to address a challenge is no longer adequate; rather it requires a system-of-systems approach, and this usually applies to inherently-complex urban projects for which planning should consider solutions using mapping analysis (Bedinger, Beevers, Walker, Visser-Quinn, & McClymont, 2020). This approach can support future design and foresee sustainable solutions, a practise which will educate future generations and advance sustainability science (Gray et al, 2019;Onat, Kucukvar, Halog, & Cloutier, 2017). It is necessary to support the right conditions for mutual understanding between all those involved in commercial and sustainability projects (Ahlström, Williams, & Vildåsen, 2020).…”
Section: Ssm At the City And Sub-city Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mind maps allow evaluating progressions in metacognition or the structuring of meanings in relation to certain concepts, while also enabling to establish the degree of association of this knowledge with other concepts internalized previously. Several authors who worked around cognitive maps (Legrand, 2000;Pudelko and Basque, 2005;Berthou and Marchand, 2010;Gray et al, 2019) converge in stating that mind maps can vary in their general structure, the way they represent knowledge and how they represent relationships. Ontoria et al (2003) discovered how university students improved several aspects through the use of mental maps, such as their disposition towards learning, the development of autonomy of thought, and self-perception.…”
Section: Knowledge Assessment Through the Use Of Mind Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontoria et al (2003) discovered how university students improved several aspects through the use of mental maps, such as their disposition towards learning, the development of autonomy of thought, and self-perception. Mind maps can be considered as external representations of individual "mental models" held over a complex real-world system (Gray et al, 2019).…”
Section: Knowledge Assessment Through the Use Of Mind Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%