Assessing Social Vulnerability to Flood Hazards in the Dutch Province of Zeeland

Abstract

The 2007 European Union Floods Directive encouraged member nations to pursue a more integrated view of flood risks and management strategies, taking into account social vulnerabilities of residents. To date, most flood-risk analyses conducted by the Dutch government have focused on physical risk. This study utilizes fine-scale data to construct a social vulnerability index for 147 districts of the Dutch province of Zeeland, located in the Southwestern Delta and the scene of widespread devastation following the 1953 North Sea Flood. Factor analysis of 25 indicators of social vulnerability selected from related research in Europe and the United States results in seven factors explaining roughly 66% of the total variance. These factors of social vulnerability in Zeeland are urban density, low-income households, recent population change, female gender, train access, and self-employed and service-sector employment. The index was constructed using the toploading variable in each of these factors, with weights determined by the variance explained by each factor. Scores range from a low of 0.20 in Schore, municipality of Kapelle, to the highest score of 0.64 in Oudelandse Hoeve of Terneuzen. The most vulnerable districts are located in South Zeeland, with eight of the 10 found in Terneuzen. The majority of less vulnerable districts are located in Zeeland's central region.

Social vulnerability of coastal fish farming community to tidal (Rob) flooding: a case study from Indramayu, Indonesia

“…Existing literature discussed ways to increase SES resilience by improving overall community adaptive capacity (Ferro-Azcona et al 2019), including the need for external support and local government's mitigation efforts (Mohanty et al 2019). Some emphasized the need for and application of social-environmental indicators (Cutter et al 2003) and the general impact of flood damage (Kirby et al 2019). When measuring a system's resilience, challenges include the qualitative nature of certain resilience variables, the vague definition of the concept (Gallopín 2006), and determining those variables most critical in influencing a community's vulnerability (Cutter et al 2003;Armaș and Gavriș 2013).…”

Geospatial Approach For Assessment Of Vulnerability To Flood In Local Self Governments

“…contribute to the flood vulnerability in addition to proximity to river (Samanta et al, 2018). Moreover, the flood vulnerability is also associated with the vulnerability of community assessed based on the socio-economic condition of people in the area (Kirby et al, 2019). In contrast, we can observe that an area which may be classified as highly vulnerable under the socio-economic aspect, may not be subjected to a higher degree of flood vulnerability under the physiographic domain.…”

An Operational Framework for Urban Vulnerability to Floods in the Guayas Estuary Region: The Duran Case Study

“…where FVI j is the vulnerability index, W i is the weight represented by the factorial loads of higher value, X ij is the value of the indicator, j indicates the blocks, while i represents indicators, X i is the mean value of the indicator and S i is the standard deviation [39,40]. To obtain weights from the PCA, it was important to choose factors that: (i) have associated eigen values greater than one; (ii) contribute individually to the explanation of the general variance by more than 10%; and (iii) contribute cumulatively to the explanation of the overall variance by more than 50% [29,39,[41][42][43]. In this analysis, the Exposure Index was calculated by four variables related to: geomorphology (flood level), recurrence of flooding (history of events), population density as an exposed factor and susceptibility to flooding due to soil features.…”