2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2020.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing stress conditions and impact velocities in fluidized bed opposed jet mills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is linked to SEM-based single particle stressing where measured stress–strain curves of compressed probe particles, for instance ductile metal particles, can be modeled by FEM simulation [ 69 ]. This combined experimental–theoretical approach provides a direct link to the reaction of the stressed particles under the influence of [ 70 ].…”
Section: Process Chain For Particle Formation and Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is linked to SEM-based single particle stressing where measured stress–strain curves of compressed probe particles, for instance ductile metal particles, can be modeled by FEM simulation [ 69 ]. This combined experimental–theoretical approach provides a direct link to the reaction of the stressed particles under the influence of [ 70 ].…”
Section: Process Chain For Particle Formation and Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluidized bed geometry and operating conditions used in all simulations were based on the experimental works available in the literature [2,3,6].…”
Section: Fluidized Bed Opposed Jet Mill Unit and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jet mill is composed of a classifier wheel of 0.05 m in outer diameter, placed at the upper part of the equipment (classifying region), and three Laval nozzles with an exit diameter of 2.4 mm (D nozzle ) positioned in the grinding region, one at the bottom, and two at the lateral wall of the equipment inclined at an angle of 30 • and separated by a distance of 65.4 mm (Figure 1). Glass microspheres with a mean diameter of 55 µm and a density of 2500 kg/m 3 [6], were used. The porosity of the packed bed was of 0.38.…”
Section: Fluidized Bed Opposed Jet Mill Unit and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations