2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Students’ Translation Competence: Integrating China’s Standards of English With Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Approaches

Abstract: While translation competence assessment has been playing an increasingly facilitating role in translation teaching and learning, it still failed to offer fine-grained diagnostic feedback based on certain reliable translation competence standards. As such, this study attempted to investigate the feasibility of providing diagnostic information about students’ translation competence by integrating China’s Standards of English (CSE) with cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) approaches. Under the descriptive param… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of such methodological advances include the extension and development of the models, such as the generalized DINA model (GDINA, [28]) and the multistrategy DINA model (MS-DINA; [29]), Q-matrix validation and refinement methods (e.g., [5,30,31]), the investigation of differential item functioning in CDMs (e.g., [6,32,33]), and the existence of various software tools such as the CDM [34] and GDINA [35] packages in R [36]. Examples of CDM applications are evidenced by studies collected in the special issue of "Cognitive Diagnosis and Q-Matrices in Language Assessment" (e.g., [21,22,37,38]) in the journal Language Assessment Quarterly, as well as many others (e.g., [2,17,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such methodological advances include the extension and development of the models, such as the generalized DINA model (GDINA, [28]) and the multistrategy DINA model (MS-DINA; [29]), Q-matrix validation and refinement methods (e.g., [5,30,31]), the investigation of differential item functioning in CDMs (e.g., [6,32,33]), and the existence of various software tools such as the CDM [34] and GDINA [35] packages in R [36]. Examples of CDM applications are evidenced by studies collected in the special issue of "Cognitive Diagnosis and Q-Matrices in Language Assessment" (e.g., [21,22,37,38]) in the journal Language Assessment Quarterly, as well as many others (e.g., [2,17,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%