Assessing Substance Abuse Questions in Child Custody Evaluations

Schleuderer, Claude; Campagna, Vicky

doi:10.1177/1531244504422015

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recommendations to health providers, social workers, counselors, and other professionals included: take steps to balance Part 2 and child protection, 21 track laws and regulations and seek advice from supervisors, 20,22,33,37 obtain informed consent involving SUD data sharing, 25 screen or track SUD history, 26,29 comply with existing confidentiality laws, 37 and comply with both Part 2 and state laws 37 . Proposed recommendations related to technology included implementation of standards to help reduce stigma, increase engagement in treatments, 30 employment of data segmentation to protect inmates, 27,32 and deployment of technological safeguards to protect patient privacy in HIE and individual internet user profiles 39 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of Part 2 challenges, the following conclusions were reported: the regulation is ambiguous in providing guidance to the judiciary about determining the appropriateness of law enforcement intervention, especially in correctional settings, 16 Part 2 focuses only on confidentiality rather than privacy, 19 Part 2 compliance is challenging in the context of mental health and other medical records, 17 and Part 2 compliance has challenges in the context of prescription monitoring programs. 44 Recommendations to health providers, social workers, counselors, and other professionals included: take steps to balance Part 2 and child protection, 21 track laws and regulations and seek advice from supervisors, 20,22,33,37 obtain informed consent involving SUD data sharing, 25 screen or track SUD history, 26,29 comply with existing confidentiality laws, 37 and comply with both Part 2 and state laws. 37 Proposed recommendations related to technology included implementation of standards to help reduce stigma, increase engagement in treatments, 30 employment of data segmentation to protect inmates, 27,32 and deployment of technological safeguards to protect patient privacy in HIE and individual internet user profiles.…”

Section: Scoping Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Recommendations to Inform Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing Research: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTitle 42 Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2 or Part 2) was enacted in 1975 to protect patients receiving treatment for substance use disorders. A scoping review on Part 2 characterized published work.MethodsSeven databases were searched. Studies were categorized based on date of publication, primary objectives, methods, and findings. A thematic analysis was conducted using article titles and abstracts.ResultsOf the 36 studies identified, the majority (78%) were opinions or legal reviews, (22%) employed quantitative and/or qualitative methods to study the impact of Part 2, and over half (58%) were published in the past 5 years. Only 8% of studies reported stakeholder involvement in Part 2 studies and no study included patients or patient advocates. No study discussed the efforts to align Part 2 with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or provided evidence of the benefit of this alignment. Three main themes emerged from the review: care delivery (46.6%), law and ethics (27.6%), and technology (25.9%). There were no studies focusing on stigma and its effect on substance use treatment and Part 2.ConclusionsDespite the significance of Part 2, the literature is sparse. It is time to initiate a new era of scholarly research that focuses on the impact of statutes and policies that govern substance use disorder data sharing. Specifically, we recommend research on Part 2 and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act alignment, the effects of Part 2 on patients, as well as providers and other stakeholder perceptions on the regulation.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Scoping Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recommendations to Inform Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing Research: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Assessing for sexual abuse in these evaluations was addressed by Bow et al (2002), Ackerman and Dolezal (2006), and Hendershot and Bow (2013). Substance abuse in child custody evaluations was examined by McMahon and Giannini (2003) and Schleuderer and Campagna (2004). Breeden et al (2008) collected data similar to those of Keilin and Bloom (1986), but in relation to cases where at least one parent had a physical disability.…”

Section: Literature Review Of Survey Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Child custody evaluation practices: Where we were, where we are, and where we are going.

Ackerman¹,

Bow²,

Mathy³

2021

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Child custody practice has evolved over the past 35 years. The present article will review the past history, current status, and future of this practice area. A thorough review of child custody survey research will be presented, as well as applicable ethical standards and forensic/child custody guidelines. This suggests the field has advanced with established forensic procedures and methods. It is further proposed that a standard of practice has been established through child custody and forensic guidelines, the APA Ethics Code, scholarly publications, survey research findings, and evaluators' increased understanding of forensic issues (i.e., psycho-legal basis for the evaluation and admissibility criteria), which should benefit the profession, legal community, and families. Public Significance StatementA standard of practice for child custody evaluations has been established through the development of child custody and forensic guidelines, APA Ethics Code, scholarly publications, 35 years of survey research findings, and evaluators' increased understanding of forensic issues.

show abstract

Assessing Substance Abuse Questions in Child Custody Evaluations

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Recommendations to Inform Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing Research: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

Recommendations to Inform Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing Research: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

Child custody evaluation practices: Where we were, where we are, and where we are going.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About