2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing supplier environmental performance: Applying Analytical Hierarchical Process in the United Arab Emirates healthcare chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Lee and Drake [8] and Ishizaka et al [9], AHP is a reliable tool in modern scenarios because it provides optimal solutions for many complex multi-criteria decision making problems. Originally proposed by Saaty in 1980, AHP has been applied in a variety of applications; it measures intangibles with the assistance of experts' judgments through pair-wise comparisons [10]. In AHP, complex problems are solved by inserting them into a hierarchical structure in order to measure the level of impact from one level to another.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Lee and Drake [8] and Ishizaka et al [9], AHP is a reliable tool in modern scenarios because it provides optimal solutions for many complex multi-criteria decision making problems. Originally proposed by Saaty in 1980, AHP has been applied in a variety of applications; it measures intangibles with the assistance of experts' judgments through pair-wise comparisons [10]. In AHP, complex problems are solved by inserting them into a hierarchical structure in order to measure the level of impact from one level to another.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pairwise comparison matrices in calculating the weights of criteria and sub-criteria [86,87]. In the implementation of AHP methodology, in the first phase, the main criteria weights were obtained which were followed by the determination of sub-criteria weights as follows.…”
Section: Main Criteria Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of AHP model development are well documented in [27][73] [74]. Nevertheless the process is summarized below in four steps.…”
Section: Ahp Methods Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a group decision modelling approach is adopted in this research, following Basak and Saaty [73] and Malik et al [74],a geometric mean is used for combining individual expert's pair-wise comparisons for all four hierarchy levels. In calculating the priority weights at criteria and sub-criteria level, the most widely used method of Eigenvectors is employed [81].…”
Section: Developing Ahp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%