2019
DOI: 10.1111/jir.12683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing support needs in children with intellectual disability and motor impairments: measurement invariance and group differences

Abstract: Background This study assessed the equivalence of the measurement of support needs between children with intellectual disability (ID) and children with intellectual and motor disabilities (IMD) and compared both groups in the different domains of support. Method The Supports Intensity Scale‐Children's Version was used to assess the support needs of 713 children with ID and 286 children with IMD, mainly associated with cerebral palsy. Results The results supported measurement invariance between the group of ID … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of the supports paradigm results in one's ability to assess the pattern and intensity of support needs and using this information for subgroup classification, aligning support needs to support strategies, and identifying and operationalizing systems of support elements (Gómez et al, 2021b). In this sense, AAIDD and INICO have also made an intensive work of development and adaptation of standardized assessment of support needs (e.g., Aguayo et al, 2019;Amor et al, 2021;Claes et al, 2009;Dizdarevic et al, 2020;Thompson et al, 2015Thompson et al, , 2016Verdugo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the supports paradigm results in one's ability to assess the pattern and intensity of support needs and using this information for subgroup classification, aligning support needs to support strategies, and identifying and operationalizing systems of support elements (Gómez et al, 2021b). In this sense, AAIDD and INICO have also made an intensive work of development and adaptation of standardized assessment of support needs (e.g., Aguayo et al, 2019;Amor et al, 2021;Claes et al, 2009;Dizdarevic et al, 2020;Thompson et al, 2015Thompson et al, , 2016Verdugo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have difficulties interacting with other children or participating in classroom discussions. In comparison with children with motor disorders, these children do not avoid contact but do have difficulties with communication, conditioned by their ID or lack of language skills [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the SIS-A [12], each activity is rated across three measurement methods (i.e., type of support, frequency, and daily support time) and the scores obtained through the use of the SIS-C count with evidence of validity and reliability [7]. The SIS-C has been adapted and validated in different contexts (e.g., [18]) and there is an increasing interest in investigating its appropriateness and evidence of validity and reliability for children and adolescents with other disabilities [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%