2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10114271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Sustainable Food and Nutrition Security of the EU Food System—An Integrated Approach

Abstract: Steering the EU food system towards a sustainability transformation requires a vast and actionable knowledge base available to a range of public and private actors. Few have captured this complexity by assessing food systems from a multi-dimensional and multi-level perspective, which would include (1) nutrition and diet, environmental and economic outcomes together with social equity dimensions and (2) system interactions across country, EU and global scales. This paper addresses this gap in food systems resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…MAIS analysts, drawing on generic innovation system theories, can utilize some of the existing innovation system analysis frameworks such as functional-structural analysis, innovation policy mix analysis, or social network analysis to analyse MAIS ( Hermans et al, 2019 ; Lamprinopoulou et al, 2014 ; Spielman et al, 2011 ; Wieczorek and Hekkert, 2012 ; Schut et al, 2015 ). This can be combined with agricultural and food systems assessment and modelling approaches focusing for example on resilience ( Meuwissen et al, 2019 ; Tittonell, 2020 ), and drawing on recent frameworks to analyse different aspects of food systems transformation ( Gaitán-Cremaschi et al, 2019 ; Hebinck et al, 2018 ; Kanter et al, 2015 ; Termeer et al, 2018 ; Zurek et al, 2018 ). Such analysis may make use of data science or citizen science driven approaches bringing together large datasets of biophysical and socioeconomic data to track mission evolution ( Beza et al, 2017 ; Fielke et al, 2020 ; Guo et al, 2020 ; Klerkx et al, 2019 ; Sauermann et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Mission-oriented Agricultural Innovation Systems: What Whymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAIS analysts, drawing on generic innovation system theories, can utilize some of the existing innovation system analysis frameworks such as functional-structural analysis, innovation policy mix analysis, or social network analysis to analyse MAIS ( Hermans et al, 2019 ; Lamprinopoulou et al, 2014 ; Spielman et al, 2011 ; Wieczorek and Hekkert, 2012 ; Schut et al, 2015 ). This can be combined with agricultural and food systems assessment and modelling approaches focusing for example on resilience ( Meuwissen et al, 2019 ; Tittonell, 2020 ), and drawing on recent frameworks to analyse different aspects of food systems transformation ( Gaitán-Cremaschi et al, 2019 ; Hebinck et al, 2018 ; Kanter et al, 2015 ; Termeer et al, 2018 ; Zurek et al, 2018 ). Such analysis may make use of data science or citizen science driven approaches bringing together large datasets of biophysical and socioeconomic data to track mission evolution ( Beza et al, 2017 ; Fielke et al, 2020 ; Guo et al, 2020 ; Klerkx et al, 2019 ; Sauermann et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Mission-oriented Agricultural Innovation Systems: What Whymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strand of literature offers concrete metrics for assessing the FSs sustainability performance. For instance, metrics for assessing sustainable FNS are proposed, with the holistic character of the offered approach qualifying it for assessments of the entire FS (Gustafson et al, 2016;Zurek et al, 2018). While the proposed assessment metrics from Gustafson et al (2016) seem to build upon social, ecological and food security dimensions, the integrated approach offered by Zurek et al (2018) adds the economic pillar.…”
Section: Sustainability and Fss (Sustainability) Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter assessment approach proposes a sustainable FNS visualizer. The tool is based on people, planet and profit approach incorporating equitable conditions, balanced and sufficient diets, reduced environmental impacts and competitiveness of the agri-food business (Zurek et al, 2018). Both assessment approaches explicitly incorporate social well-being and equity as part of the assessment and have the potential of revealing synergies and trade-offs among potential interventions.…”
Section: Sustainability and Fss (Sustainability) Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing GHGE and not addressing health-related indicators may lead to a narrow conceptualization of sustainable diets. Besides nutrition/health and environmental (climate, pollution, biodiversity, and scarce resources), economic, ethical, and equity aspects also need to be looked at to comprehensively assess sustainability [112,113]. Multiple indicators and diverse sets of methodologies to assess sustainability might help to address the inherent complexity of sustainability and may help guide policy-making [102,113].…”
Section: Monitoring and Revising Of Policy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%