Assessing Textbook Outcome After Implementation of Transversus Abdominis Release in a Regional Hospital

Abstract

Background: The posterior component separation technique with transversus abdominis release (TAR) was introduced in 2012 as an alternative to the classic anterior component separation technique (Ramirez). This study describes outcome and learning curve of TAR, five years after implementation of this new technique in a regional hospital in the Netherlands.Methods: A standardized work up protocol, based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, was used to implement the TAR. The TAR technique as described by Novitsky was performed. After each 20 procedures, outcome parameters were evaluated and new quality measurements implemented. Primary outcome measure was Textbook Outcome, the rate of patients with an uneventful clinical postoperative course after TAR. Textbook Outcome is defined by a maximum of 7 days hospitalization without any complication (wound or systemic), reoperation or readmittance, within the first 90 postoperative days, and without a recurrence during follow up. The number of patients with a Textbook Outcome compared to the total number of consecutively performed TARs is depicted as the institutional learning curve. Secondary outcome measures were the details and incidences of the surgical site and systemic complications within 90 days, as well as long-term recurrences.Results: From 2016, sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent a TAR. Textbook Outcome was 35% and the institutional learning curve did not flatten after 69 procedures. Systemic complications occurred in 48%, wound complications in 41%, and recurrences in 4%. Separate analyses of three successive cohorts of each 20 TARs demonstrated that both Textbook Outcome (10%, 30% and 55%, respectively) and the rate of surgical site events (45%, 15%, and 10%) significantly (p < 0.05) improved with more experience.Conclusion: Implementation of the open transversus abdominis release demonstrated that outcome was positively correlated to an increasing number of TARs performed. TAR has a long learning curve, only partially determined by the technical aspects of the operation. Implementation of the TAR requires a solid plan. Building, and maintaining, an adequate setting for patients with complex ventral hernias is the real challenge and driving force to improve outcome.

The influence of a multidisciplinary team meeting and prehabilitation on complex abdominal wall hernia repair outcomes

“…In our experience, the process of optimizing patient selection in the MDT passes a learning curve [ 8 , 35 ]. Firstly, it was noticed that outcome could be improved by sticking tighter to the predetermined prehabilitation goals.…”

Impact of a multidisciplinary team discussion on planned ICU admissions after complex abdominal wall reconstruction

“…MDT consists of hernia surgeons, an intensive care physician, a pulmonologist, an anesthesiologist, a physical therapist and nurse practitioner [22,23]. The structure and aspects considered in this MDT have been described previously [24]. In summary, the process starts with anatomical hernia staging by EHS and risk-stratification by the Hernia Patient Wound (HPW) classification and Fischer score [12,25,26].…”