2008
DOI: 10.1080/14786410601132360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the antioxidative properties and chemical composition ofLinaria vulgarisinfusion

Abstract: The ability of Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae) infusion to act as a scavenger of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical, reactive oxygen species (superoxide radical, hydroxyl radical, hypochlorous acid (HOCl)) and nitric oxide was investigated. The obtained data indicate that the infusion has a good scavenging activity against superoxide radical and is a very potent nitric oxide and DPPH scavenger. In hydroxyl radical assay a pro-oxidant capacity was noticed, especially for concentrations higher than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value proved to be lower than any other plant part studied before, namely leaves (IC 50 447 lg/ml), stems (IC 50 476 lg/ml), seeds (IC 50 265 lg/ml) or petals (IC 50 197 lg/ml) . As the conditions used in the work herein were the same as described in a previous evaluation of antioxidant potential of other plant parts, direct comparisons can be made (Table 2) analysed by the same method, this matrix proved to be more active: for Linaria vulgaris the IC 50 value was 354 lg/ml (Vrchovská et al, 2008), Brassica rapa var. rapa exhibited IC 50 of 557 lg/ml (Pereira, Noites, et al, 2009) and Cydonia oblonga Miller pulp an IC 50 of 1700 lg/ml (Silva et al, 2004).…”
Section: Antioxidant Capacitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This value proved to be lower than any other plant part studied before, namely leaves (IC 50 447 lg/ml), stems (IC 50 476 lg/ml), seeds (IC 50 265 lg/ml) or petals (IC 50 197 lg/ml) . As the conditions used in the work herein were the same as described in a previous evaluation of antioxidant potential of other plant parts, direct comparisons can be made (Table 2) analysed by the same method, this matrix proved to be more active: for Linaria vulgaris the IC 50 value was 354 lg/ml (Vrchovská et al, 2008), Brassica rapa var. rapa exhibited IC 50 of 557 lg/ml (Pereira, Noites, et al, 2009) and Cydonia oblonga Miller pulp an IC 50 of 1700 lg/ml (Silva et al, 2004).…”
Section: Antioxidant Capacitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…e results revealed that this plant possessed remarkable scavenging capacity for superoxide, very intense scavenger of nitric oxide, and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) [38].…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compound was isolated from two Linaria species L. japonica, L. vulgaris, and L. kurdica subsp. eriocaly, while the whole parts were chromatographed [62][63][64].…”
Section: Scrophulariaceaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lyophilized infusion prepared from Linaria vulgaris Mill. has previously been experimented through HPLC-UV and LN was quantified with a significant content of 3.84 g/kg drug [63].…”
Section: Scrophulariaceaementioning
confidence: 99%