Assessing the application of human-centered design to translational research

Norman, Marie; Hamm, Megan; Schenker, Yael; Mayowski, Colleen A.; Hierholzer, William; Rubio, Doris McGartland; Reís, Steven E.

doi:10.1017/cts.2021.794

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This methodological framework centers stakeholder perspectives through iterative activities and ongoing analysis with the research team to co-define problems and solutions. 21 , 22 Human-centered design has been successfully applied to developing interventions in maternity care. 23 , 24 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To identify patient and health care team perspectives on screening and referral for Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) in maternity care. Methods: This human-centered design study was conducted in a prenatal clinic and in the surrounding community of a university teaching hospital in the Southeastern United States. Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews and focus groups between March 2019 and February 2020, with findings shared in-person with participants for feedback. Results: A total of 19 English- and Spanish-speaking patients and 11 health care team members participated. Participants suggested that all patients should be screened as part of integrated health assessments, early in care and periodically, but only when protocols are in place for addressing needs—immediate or ongoing. They expressed concerns that disclosure of SDoH screening data might exacerbate already existing biases, negatively impact care, or be used to harm them. Patients wanted proactive transparency about the purpose of SDoH screening, and to know who would have access to their data, when and how it would be used, and how long it would be stored. Patients expressed concern about confidentiality and stigma, and wanted their health care team to normalize seeking help, and acknowledge that birthing people's circumstances change over time. Patients and health care team responded that patient-provider communication should be respectful, be antiracist, and demonstrate respect for patient autonomy. Conclusion: Patients and health care team members recommended that SDoH resource information be accessible to all patients regardless of endorsed needs.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our course evaluation, we evaluated the extent to which students felt we had addressed equity. Human-centered design (HCD) is a philosophy and associated set of techniques to uncover unmet patient needs, promote community and organization partners buy-in, and build trust [33,34]. In the first lecture, students were introduced to Mural (Tactivos, Inc), a software tool that enables visualization of ideas for collaborative problem-solving and innovation.…”

Section: Embedding Health Equity and Human-centered Design Throughout...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Getting To Implementation (GTI)-Teach: A seven-step approach for teaching the fundamentals of implementation science

Rogal¹,

Jonassaint²,

Ashcraft³

et al. 2022

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Implementation Science (IS) is a complex and rapidly evolving discipline, posing challenges for educators. We developed, implemented, and evaluated a novel, pragmatic approach to teach IS. Methods: Getting To Implementation (GTI)-Teach was developed as a seven-step educational model to guide students through the process of developing, conducting, and sustaining an IS research project. During the four-week online course, students applied the steps to self-selected implementation problems. Students were invited to complete two online post-course surveys to assess course satisfaction and self-reported changes in IS knowledge and relevance of GTI-Teach Steps to their work. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics; self-reported post-course changes in IS knowledge were compared using paired t-tests. Results: GTI-Teach was developed to include seven Steps: 1. Define the implementation problem; 2. Conceptualize the problem; 3. Prioritize implementation barriers and facilitators; 4. Select and tailor implementation strategies; 5. Design an implementation study; 6. Evaluate implementation; 7. Sustain implementation. Thirteen students, ranging in experience from medical students to full professors, enrolled in and completed the first GTI-Teach course. Of the seven students (54%) completing an end-of course survey, six (86%) were very satisfied with the course. Ten students (77%) responded to the tailored, 6-month post-course follow-up survey. They retrospectively reported a significant increase in their knowledge across all steps of GTI-Teach (1.3–1.8 points on a 5-point Likert scale) and rated each of the Steps as highly relevant to their work. Conclusions: GTI-Teach is a seven-step model for teaching IS fundamentals that students reported increased their knowledge and was relevant to their work.

show abstract

“…The SciTS field needs more rigorous methods for every stage of the intervention development process, but we do not need to start from scratch. As proposed in this issue, the fields of human-centered design, implementation science, and health intervention development can be leveraged to develop methods specifically geared toward meeting the needs of translational teams [14][15][16][17]. Special attention is needed for the evaluation and dissemination/implementation stages of intervention development if we are to make claims of efficacy and effectiveness for our interventions.…”

Section: Emerging Themes and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction to the themed issue on the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of team science interventions in clinical and translational research

Rolland

Cross

Hohl

et al. 2021

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessing the application of human-centered design to translational research

Abstract: This version may be subject to change during the production process.

Cited by 13 publications

References 37 publications

Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives

Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives

Getting To Implementation (GTI)-Teach: A seven-step approach for teaching the fundamentals of implementation science

Introduction to the themed issue on the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of team science interventions in clinical and translational research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About