This study evaluates the characteristics of the men who served in the volunteer military in combat occupations. It examines whether these characteristics stem from supply-side or demand-side decisions, or reflect class bias. The findings suggest that, on the supply side, men who had greater academic abilities were more likely to go to college, thereby avoiding military service and the possibility of serving in a combat occupation. On the demand side, the armed forces were more likely to exclude men with lower academic abilities but were more likely to assign such men in the military to combat occupations. Net of the impacts of these supply-side and demand-side decisions, men who served in combat occupations still differed from those who did not in terms of their family background. The impact of family background was stronger on entering the military than on being assigned to combat occupations once in the military.
Keywords
military; inequality; occupationsMuch research has examined how the people who served in the U.S. military differed from those who did not (e.g., Bachman, Segal, Freedman-Doan, and O'Malley 2000) and how the men who fought and died in U.S. wars differed from those who did not (e.g., Allen, Herrmann, and Giles 1994;Wilson 1995). However, little is known about the process by which people come to be at the greatest risk of fighting and dying, the process by which they come to serve in combat occupations. Only one previous article has examined this process. It focused on the Vietnam war era and showed that servicemen with low entry test scores were more likely to serve in combat occupations than those with high test scores (Gimbel and Booth 1996). This article evaluates the characteristics of the men who were assigned to combat occupations in the late 1970s and the early 1980s, the early years of the All-Volunteer Force (AVF). Even during peacetime, service-members who perform combat occupations suffer the greatest risks relative to other service-members and receive the fewest rewards. If a war occurs, they are the ones most likely to see combat (Gimbel and Booth 1996). In addition, previous research suggests that they learn skills that are less transferable than those learned by service-members in non-combat occupations and have lower earnings in the civilian labor market (Mangum and Ball 1987
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptThis article contributes to research regarding the broader subject of social stratification in two areas. Scholars in the first area have explored educational transitions. They have theoretically and methodologically distinguished equality of opportunity from equality of result within the educational system (Buis 2008; Mare 1981). The article applies this distinction to the study of the military. It extends the model of nested transitions that has been developed to study educational outcomes to the study of the nested transitions that lead people to experience different military outcomes. Scholars in the second area have exam...