“…The growing body of work on the “humanitarian border” (Walters, 2011), analysing how logics of care and control coexist and support each other in the management of migration (Agier, 2010; Fassin, 2005; Franko Aas & Gundhus, 2015; Hyndman, 2000; İşleyen , 2018a; Little & Vaughan‐Williams, 2017; Pallister‐Wilkins, 2015; Perkowski, 2018; Ticktin, 2006; Williams, 2015), has prompted some authors to also pay specific attention to the role of NGOs/CSOs (Cuttitta, 2018a; Gerard & Weber, 2019; Lopez‐Sala & Godenau, 2019; Pallister‐Wilkins, 2017; Prokkola, 2018; Vandevoordt, 2017). However, most of the studies on NGOs/CSOs at the humanitarian border look at the territories of destination countries of the Global North, and—even in the few looking at countries of origin and transit (Sunata & Tosun, 2019)—the relationship between NGOs/CSOs, humanitarian migration management, and externalisation remains largely under‐researched. This is a promising avenue for further research, not lastly because addressing the role of human rights and humanitarianisation allows to include an analysis of Europe's normative power (Manners, 2002; Pace, 2007), and of its ability to legitimise European hegemonic neighbourhood policies (Del Sarto, 2016), in the analysis of externalisation.…”