2019
DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1702_36153632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis Weather Data Driven Hydrological Model for the Yangtze River Basin in China

Abstract: It is a challenge to adequately represent meteorological data for river basin modelling in datascarce regions. Hydrological models may benefit from alternative climate data sources such as the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) weather data. A proposed method was applied to evaluate the applicability of CFSR data in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) eco-hydrological model for the 1.8×10 6 km 2 Yangtze River Basin (YRB) in China. The CFSR data were first validated by ground-based meteorological s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values range from 0 to 1. A high FAR value and low POD and CSI values imply a more accurate quantification [41,42]. (iii) To evaluate the effectiveness of GMPs in capturing extreme weather events, this study selected indicators proposed by the "Climate Change Detection and Indicator Experts Group" [43] and "Circular on technical regulations and the process of dangerous hydro-meteorological forecasting of the MORNE, Vietnam" (2016).…”
Section: Evaluation Indicators 241 Index Evaluates Temperature and Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values range from 0 to 1. A high FAR value and low POD and CSI values imply a more accurate quantification [41,42]. (iii) To evaluate the effectiveness of GMPs in capturing extreme weather events, this study selected indicators proposed by the "Climate Change Detection and Indicator Experts Group" [43] and "Circular on technical regulations and the process of dangerous hydro-meteorological forecasting of the MORNE, Vietnam" (2016).…”
Section: Evaluation Indicators 241 Index Evaluates Temperature and Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is linked to the aquifers filling and trigger denitrification when it is close to 1. SWAT accurately simulates the discharges at different time steps and at small or large scales (Ferrant et al, 2011;Lu et al, 2019). However, the SWAT model encounters difficulties to estimate discharges at bank full depth with accuracy due to the different resolutions of the Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) used.…”
Section: Model Implementation For Denitrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data is provided in the SWAT file format, with a horizontal resolution of ~38 km (0.3125°) and global coverage [10,15]. Reanalysis data are obtained from state-of-the-art data assimilation techniques (observations from conventional weather stations such as satellite irradiations) as advanced components of atmospheric, oceanic, and surface modeling [9]. They include daily precipitation, temperatures, air humidity, solar radiation, and wind speed, provided on a Gaussian grid defined by the NCEP (designated T382), longitudes are equally spaced, but latitudes are not [10].…”
Section: Geographical Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies demonstrated the applicability and satisfactory performance of the hydrological SWAT model with CFSR data in regions with scarce data [18]. As [8] in Ethiopia; [4] in the United States, using precipitation and temperature data, obtaining discharge simulations as good or better than models using traditional meteorological measurements, when CFSR data are calculated over an area comparable to watershed areas; [7] concluded that the CFSR provided the best correlation in three regions of South America compared to other sets of reanalysis; [14] used CFSR data as input variables to the WXGEN data simulator in a basin with limited data, obtaining a satisfactory fit for the simulation of agricultural practice scenarios; [9] determined that the CFSR simulation was able to generate acceptable accuracy in China, making a previous validation with terrestrial MS data to confirm sufficient accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%