2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the completeness and accuracy of South African National Laboratory CD4 and viral load data: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of the South African National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) corporate data warehouse (CDW) using a novel data cross-matching method.MethodsAdults (≥18 years) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) who visited a hospital-based HIV clinic in Durban from March to June 2012 were included. We matched patient identifiers, CD4 and viral load (VL) records from the HIV clinic’s electronic record with the NHLS CDW according to a set of matching criteria for patient identifiers, test values a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimate is lower and may be more accurate than our previous estimate of 82%, which was based on patient self-report of re-linkage and validation of an initial clinic visit for a subset of patients [28]. We have previously assessed the completeness and accuracy of the NHLS CDW by matching patient identifiers and pretransfer CD4 and VL test results from the McCord Hospital dataset to data returned by NHLS; we reported that NHLS did not find a match for 10% of the patients in the transfer cohort [23], which may have also affected the ability to match post-transfer laboratories for a small proportion of patients. It is also possible that patients in care post-transfer were classified as "not re-linked" because they were not receiving guideline concordant CD4 count and VL monitoring at their new clinical site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This estimate is lower and may be more accurate than our previous estimate of 82%, which was based on patient self-report of re-linkage and validation of an initial clinic visit for a subset of patients [28]. We have previously assessed the completeness and accuracy of the NHLS CDW by matching patient identifiers and pretransfer CD4 and VL test results from the McCord Hospital dataset to data returned by NHLS; we reported that NHLS did not find a match for 10% of the patients in the transfer cohort [23], which may have also affected the ability to match post-transfer laboratories for a small proportion of patients. It is also possible that patients in care post-transfer were classified as "not re-linked" because they were not receiving guideline concordant CD4 count and VL monitoring at their new clinical site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As we reported previously, after extensive efforts assessing the quality of subject matching for data provided by the NHLS, we determined that 99.7% of the individuals were correctly matched . Based on this result, we previously recommended that matches from NHLS be accepted without extensive review, and have followed this approach in the current analysis . Patients who had at least one NHLS record, whether CD4 count or VL, within approximately three years after the end of the transfer period were considered re‐linked.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data from the CDW has been evaluated for completeness and accuracy and validated as a good source of data for research on HIV in South Africa. [21]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%